Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33970465›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2021

Sustaining Meaningful Patient Engagement Across the Lifecycle of Medicines: A Roadmap for Action.

Maria Cavaller-Bellaubi, Stuart D Faulkner, Bryan Teixeira, Mathieu Boudes, Eva Molero, Nicholas Brooke, Laura McKeaveney, Jeffrey Southerton, Maria José Vicente, Neil Bertelsen and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 7 countries.

Maria Cavaller-BellaubiEURORDIS-Rare Diseases Europe, Paris, France.
Stuart D FaulknerRadcliffe Primary Care Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Rd, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6345-5323
Bryan TeixeiraEuropean AIDS Treatment Group (EATG), Düsseldorf, Germany.
Mathieu BoudesEuropean Patients' Forum (EPF), Chaussée d'Etterbeek, Brussels, Belgium.
Eva MoleroTeamit Research S.L., Barcelona, Spain.
Nicholas BrookeThe Synergist, Brussels, Belgium.
Laura McKeaveneyNovartis International AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Jeffrey SouthertonPfizer Inc, San Diego, CA, USA.
Maria José VicenteAragón Health Sciences Institute, Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud (IACS), Zaragoza, Spain.
Neil BertelsenHealth Technology Assessment International (HTAi)-Patient and Citizen Involvement Interest Group, Berlin, Germany.
Juan García-BurgosEuropean Medicines Agency (EMA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Vinciane PirardSanofi-Genzyme, Brussels, Belgium.
Kirsty ReidEuropean Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA), Brussels, Belgium.
Elisa FerrerEURORDIS-Rare Diseases Europe, Paris, France. ferrer.elisa@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9345-8659
European Organisation for Rare Diseases · FREuropean Federation of Allergy and Airways Diseases Patients Associations · BEEuropean Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations · BEEuropean Medicines Agency · NLInstituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud · ESJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GBNovartis (Switzerland) · CHPfizer (United States) · USSanofi (Belgium) · BE

Funding

Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking Grant Agreement 777450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is increased recognition that incorporating patients' perspectives and insights into the medicines development process results in better health outcomes and benefits for all involved stakeholders. Despite the increased interest and the existence of frameworks and practical recommendations, patient engagement (PE) is not yet considered standard practice. The objective of this work was to provide a roadmap to support systematic change in all stakeholder organisations involved in medicines development across Europe, patients and patient organisations, medicines developers, academia, regulatory authorities, Health Technology Assessment bodies, payers, policy-makers and public research funders, to sustain PE practices.

methodsA mixed-methods approach was used by the EU-funded Innovative Medicines Initiative PARADIGM Consortium to co-develop the sustainability roadmap including background work to identify success factors and scenarios for sustainable PE. The roadmap development was based on the Theory of Change concept and populated with findings from (1) interviews with national/ and international institutions with the potential to increase PE uptake by other stakeholders; (2) multi-stakeholder workshops and webinars; and (3) consultations with specific stakeholder groups, Consortium members and a consultative body formed by international PE initiatives.

resultsThis roadmap sets strategic goals for the PE community to achieve meaningful and systematic PE through changes in the culture, processes and resources of stakeholder organisations. It brings in key PARADIGM outputs to work in a coordinated fashion with existing frameworks and mechanisms to achieve system-wide sustained PE.

conclusionsThe roadmap provides a framework for all stakeholders to take collective action within their organisations and across Europe to implement PE in a sustainable manner.

Indexed as

Patient ParticipationTechnology Assessment, BiomedicalEuropeHumansCall to actionMedicines developmentPatient engagementRoadmapSustainability

Identifiers

PMID33970465
PMCPMC8108434
OpenAlexW3160491123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.