Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33970428›Full record

ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2022

Characteristic of IgA and IgG antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in an Italian referral COVID-19 Hospital.

Annamaria Carnicelli, Barbara Fiori, Rosalba Ricci, Alfonso Piano, Nicola Bonadia, Eleonora Taddei, Massimo Fantoni, Rita Murri, Antonella Cingolani, Christian Barillaro and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Annamaria CarnicelliDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy. annamaria.carnicelli@policlinicogemelli.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3980-2898
Barbara FioriDepartment of Laboratory Sciences and Infectious Diseases, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Rosalba RicciDepartment of Laboratory Sciences and Infectious Diseases, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Alfonso PianoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Nicola BonadiaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Eleonora TaddeiDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Laboratory Sciences and Infectious Diseases, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Massimo FantoniDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Laboratory Sciences and Infectious Diseases, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Rita MurriDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Laboratory Sciences and Infectious Diseases, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Antonella CingolaniDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Laboratory Sciences and Infectious Diseases, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Christian BarillaroDepartment of Geriatrics, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Salvatore Lucio CutuliInstitute of Anesthesia and Resuscitation, Department of Emergency Medicine, Anesthesiology and Resuscitation, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Debora MarchesiniDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Davide Antonio Della PollaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Evelina ForteDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Mariella FuorloDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Luca Di MaurizioDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Paola AmoriniDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Paola CattaniDepartment of Laboratory Sciences and Infectious Diseases, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Francesco FranceschiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Maurizio SanguinettiDepartment of Laboratory Sciences and Infectious Diseases, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAntibody response plays a fundamental role in the natural history of infectious disease. A better understanding of the immune response in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection could be important for identifying patients at greater risk of developing a more severe form of disease and with a worse prognosis.

methodsWe performed a cross-sectional analysis to determine the presence and the levels of both anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgA in a cohort of hospitalized patients with confirmed infection at different times in the natural history of the disease. Patients enrolled when admitted at the emergency department were prospectively followed up during hospital stay.

resultsOverall, 131 patients were considered with a total of 237 samples processed. Cross-sectional analysis showed that seroconversion for IgA seems to occur between days 6 and 15, while IgG response seems to occur slightly later, peaking at day 20 after symptoms onset. Both IgA and IgG were maintained beyond 2 months. Severe patients showed a higher IgA response compared with mild patients when analyzing optical density (8.3 versus 5.6, p < 0.001). Prospective analysis conducted on 55 patients confirmed that IgA appear slightly earlier than IgG. After stratifying for the severity of disease, both the IgA and IgG responses were more vigorous in severe cases. Moreover, while IgG tended to stabilize, there was a relevant decline after the first month of IgA levels in mild cases.

conclusionIgA and IgG antibody response is closely related, although seroconversion for IgA occurs earlier. Both IgA and IgG are maintained beyond 2 months. Severe patients showed a more vigorous IgA and IgG response. IgA levels seem to decline after 1 month since the onset of symptoms in mild cases. Our results should be interpreted with cautions due to several limitations in our study, mainly the small number of cases, lack of data on viral load and clinical setting.

Indexed as

COVID-19Antibody FormationCross-Sectional StudiesHospitalsHumansImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GReferral and ConsultationSARS-CoV-2Immunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GAntibodyCOVID-19IgAIgGSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33970428
PMCPMC8107418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.