Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33970377›Full record

ArticleJournal, genetic engineering & biotechnology2021

Stress-induced expression of IPT gene in transgenic wheat reduces grain yield penalty under drought.

Ailin Beznec, Paula Faccio, Daniel J Miralles, Leonor G Abeledo, Cecilia Decima Oneto, María de Belén Garibotto, Germán Gonzalez, Federico Moreyra, Matías Elizondo, Mónica Ruíz and 5 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Overexpression ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Ailin BeznecInstituto de Genética, "Edwald A. Favret", Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Buenos Aires, Argentina. beznec.ailin@inta.gob.ar.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2910-1748
Paula FaccioInstituto de Genética, "Edwald A. Favret", Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Daniel J MirallesCátedra de Cerealicultura, Facultad de Agronomía de la Universidad de Buenos Aires, Av. San Martín 4453, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Leonor G AbeledoCátedra de Cerealicultura, Facultad de Agronomía de la Universidad de Buenos Aires, Av. San Martín 4453, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Cecilia Decima OnetoLaboratorio de Agrobiotecnología, EEA Balcarce, INTA, Ruta 226, Km 73.5, B7620, Balcarce, Argentina.
María de Belén GaribottoInstituto de Genética, "Edwald A. Favret", Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Germán GonzalezEEA Bordenave, INTA, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Federico MoreyraEEA Bordenave, INTA, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Matías ElizondoEEA San Juan, INTA, San Juan, Argentina.
Mónica RuízEEA San Juan, INTA, San Juan, Argentina.
Dalia LewiInstituto de Genética, "Edwald A. Favret", Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Eduardo BlumwaldDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, USA.
Berta LlorenteDepartamento de Ciencias Básicas, Universidad Nacional de Luján, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Antonio Díaz PaleoEEA Pergamino, INTA, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Ezequiel BossioInstituto de Genética, "Edwald A. Favret", Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
National Agricultural Technology Institute · ARConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARNational University of San Juan · ARUniversidad de Buenos Aires · ARNational Institute of Industrial Technology · ARNational University of Luján · ARPlant (United States) · US

Funding

Fondo para la Investigación Científica y Tecnológica PICT-2016-0571Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria PNBIO1131024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe heterologous expression of isopentenyl transferase (IPT) under the transcriptional control of the senescence-associated receptor-like kinase (SARK) promoter delayed cellular senescence and, through it, increased drought tolerance in plants. To evaluate the effect of pSARK::IPT expression in bread wheat, six independent transgenic events were obtained through the biolistic method and evaluated transgene expression, phenology, grain yield and physiological biomass components in plants grown under both drought and well-irrigating conditions. Experiments were performed at different levels: (i) pots and (ii) microplots inside a biosafety greenhouse, as well as under (iii) field conditions.

resultsTwo transgenic events, called TR1 and TR4, outperformed the wild-type control under drought conditions. Transgenic plants showed higher yield under both greenhouse and field conditions, which was positively correlated to grain number (given by more spikes and grains per spike) than wild type. Interestingly, this yield advantage of the transgenic events was observed under both drought and well-watered conditions.

conclusionsThe results obtained allow us to conclude that the SARK promoter-regulated expression of the IPT gene in bread wheat not only reduced the yield penalty produced by water stress but also led to improved productivity under well-watered conditions.

Indexed as

Agronomic traitsCytokininGenetic transformationIsopentenyl transferase geneTriticum aestivum LWater-deficit tolerance

Identifiers

PMID33970377
PMCPMC8110665
OpenAlexW3161973121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.