Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33970372›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2021

Management of Soft Tissue Sarcomas in Extremities: Variation in Treatment Recommendations and Surveillance According to Specialty and Continent.

Ibtissam Acem, Merel M Smit, Cornelis Verhoef, Winan J van Houdt, Rick L Haas, Jos A van der Hage, Dirk J Grünhagen, Michiel A J van de Sande

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Context factors in clinical decision-making: a scoping review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ibtissam AcemDepartment of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. i.acem@erasmusmc.nl.
Merel M SmitDepartment of Orthopedic Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Cornelis VerhoefDepartment of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Winan J van HoudtDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Rick L HaasDepartment of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jos A van der HageDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Dirk J GrünhagenDepartment of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Michiel A J van de SandeDepartment of Orthopedic Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLLeiden University · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to provide an insight into clinical decision-making and surveillance strategy of sarcoma specialists for patients with primary soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities (eSTS). The secondary aim was to quantify the role of patient- and tumor-specific factors in the perioperative management.

methodsMembers of sarcoma societies were sent a Web-based 21-item survey about eSTS management. The survey concerned only primary resectable high-grade eSTS in adults.

resultsThe study enrolled 396 respondents. The majority of the surgical specialists thought the evidence for perioperative chemotherapy (CTX) for high-grade eSTS was insufficient. Radiotherapy (RTX) was less frequently offered in Asia than in North America and Europe. The specialties and continents also differed regarding the importance of patient and tumor characteristics influencing RTX and CTX recommendation. For surveillance after initial treatment outpatient visits, chest computed tomography (CT) scans, and magnetic resonance images of the extremity were the methods primarily used. The specialists in North America preferred chest CT scan over chest x-ray, whereas those in Asia and Europe had no clear preference. DISCUSSION: Specialty and continent are important factors contributing to the variation in clinical practice, treatment recommendations, and surveillance of patients with primary resectable high-grade eSTS.

Indexed as

Radiation OncologySarcomaSoft Tissue NeoplasmsAdultExtremitiesHumansNeoadjuvant Therapy

Identifiers

PMID33970372
PMCPMC8519885
OpenAlexW3163893884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.