Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33970339›Full record

ArticleSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2021

[Virtual palliative care : Pilot study of an electronic tool to test cognitive, psychomotor and affective palliative medical and pain therapeutic learning contents during medical training].

A Scherg, K Oechsle, A Coym, B Ilse, B Annweiler, B Alt-Epping, M Neukirchen, M Lemos, T Stummer, J Seibel and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. [Palliative Care Education].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

A SchergKlinik für Palliativmedizin, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland. scherg@evkwesel.de.
K OechslePalliativmedizin, Universitäres Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Deutschland.
A CoymPalliativmedizin, Universitäres Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Deutschland.
B IlseHans-Berger-Klinik für Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Deutschland.
B AnnweilerZentrum für Palliativmedizin, Helios Klinikum Schwerin, Schwerin, Deutschland.
B Alt-EppingAbteilung für Palliativmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
M NeukirchenKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
M LemosAudiovisuelles Medienzentrum, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Deutschland.
T StummerAudiovisuelles Medienzentrum, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Deutschland.
J SeibelInstitut für Transfusionsmedizin, UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Deutschland.
A LenesMedizinische Fakultät, RWTH Aachen, AIXTRA Trainingszentrum, Aachen, Deutschland.
F ElsnerKlinik für Palliativmedizin, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland.
Universitätsklinikum Aachen · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEHeidelberg University · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEHelios Hospital Schwerin · DEJena University Hospital · DERWTH Aachen University · DEUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis article describes a first use of an electronic case-based assessment tool in undergraduate palliative care education. It describes the development of the tool presenting strengths and shortcomings in order to contribute to an innovative design of assessment tools in medical education. DESIGN AND

methodAn electronic (virtual) case-based assessment tool (the virtual palliative patient, vPp) was developed. Palliative care levels of knowledge, skills and attitude of students were tested at a computer workplace as a voluntary and non-performance-relevant pilot project at four faculties.

resultsOn average the students achieved 80% of the points using the vPp tool, which is below the average score of 91% achieved in the regular examination. In particular, the free text task on reflection of dealing with the patient's death wish caused uncertainty, while multiple choice questions and an interactive conversation sequence were perceived as relatively easy. Technical problems were also identified in the evaluation but overall the concept was evaluated positively and establishment as a regular examination or e‑learning tool was desired.

conclusionThe implementation of an innovative assessment tool in medical education is technically challenging. A coordination with contents of the individual faculties is necessary in order that students do not have a feeling of a lack of preparation. The development of the vPp describes an innovative assessment format. In the long term, all interested faculties could receive a form of toolbox containing the technical framework of the assessment tool, which can then be fed with new contents.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, UndergraduateStudents, MedicalCognitionCurriculumElectronicsHumansPainPalliative CarePilot ProjectsDigitalizationE‑learningInteractive learningMedical educationPalliative medicine

Identifiers

PMID33970339
OpenAlexW3161118130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.