Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33970319›Full record

SynthesisClinical oral investigations2021

Vital pulp therapy in carious pulp-exposed permanent teeth: an umbrella review.

Dephne Jack Xin Leong, Adrian Ujin Yap

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical oral investigations, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Mineral Trioxide AggregateIranian endodontic journal · 2022
    Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dephne Jack Xin LeongDepartment of Dentistry, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, 1 Jurong East Street 21, Singapore, 609606, Singapore. dephdep@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1653-9978
Adrian Ujin YapDepartment of Dentistry, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, 1 Jurong East Street 21, Singapore, 609606, Singapore.
Ng Teng Fong General Hospital · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThere has been increasing evidence indicating rather high success rates of vital pulp therapies. This umbrella review aimed to provide an overview of existing systematic reviews regarding the outcomes of vital pulp therapy, specifically direct pulp capping, partial pulpotomy and full pulpotomy, in carious pulp-exposed permanent human teeth. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe specific PICO questions were as follows: Population - permanent human teeth with carious pulp exposure; Intervention - direct pulp capping with pulp capping materials; Comparators - partial pulpotomy and full pulpotomy; Outcomes - success rate and prognostic factors. PubMed, Ovid and Cochrane databases were searched in conjunction with hand searching. Grey literature was searched too. Study selection, data extraction and study appraisal were performed independently by two authors. A consensus was reached through discussion when disagreements arose.

resultsSix articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Higher and more predictable success rates of ≥ 2 years were observed for partial pulpotomy and full pulpotomy in carious pulp-exposed permanent human teeth as compared to direct pulp capping. Possible prognostic factors (pre-operative pulp status, pulp capping material and apex closure) yielded conflicting results. Restorative material, periapical status at baseline, final irrigation solution, age and study type did not seem to affect the treatment outcome.

conclusionsVital pulp therapy is a reliable treatment option for permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure. However, more high-quality studies are required to corroborate this finding. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Vital pulp therapy could be considered as an alternative for root canal treatment for carious pulp-exposed permanent teeth.

Indexed as

Dental CariesPulpotomyDental Pulp CappingDental Pulp ExposureDentition, PermanentHumansSilicatesTreatment OutcomeSilicatesCariesDirect pulp cappingMeta-analysisPulpotomySystematic reviewVital pulp therapy

Identifiers

PMID33970319
OpenAlexW3160539928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.