ReviewDer Nervenarzt2021
[Imaging-based patient selection for mechanical thrombectomy based on time since symptom onset].
Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO), the indications for patient selection for endovascular mechanical thrombectomy (MT) are based on findings from brain imaging. Several imaging protocols from computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are available to guide treatment decisions.
objectiveTo recommend the optimal choice of imaging modalities and protocols for MT with respect to time windows from symptom onset. MATERIAL AND
methodsEvaluation of the results of large randomized placebo-controlled trials regarding imaging-based patient selection in MT categorized by time intervals since symptom onset. We discuss methodological aspects, advantages and caveats of individual stroke imaging protocols. Summary of recommendations for the practice. RESULTS AND
conclusionIn MT trials CT was mostly used for patient selection. Plain CT combined with CT angiography or additional perfusion imaging is the preferred option. In early time windows CT with CTA is adequate (≤ 6 h for MT, ≤ 4.5 h in cases of accompanying thrombolysis according to exclusion criteria). In later or unknown time windows perfusion imaging is needed for patient selection. Patients presenting with unknown time windows should be examined by MRI as a first-line choice in mild to moderate deficits, in cases of severe deficits CT imaging with perfusion imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.