Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33970268›Full record

Trial reportThe journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences2021

Change in CAIDE Dementia Risk Score and Neuroimaging Biomarkers During a 2-Year Multidomain Lifestyle Randomized Controlled Trial: Results of a Post-Hoc Subgroup Analysis.

Ruth Stephen, Tiia Ngandu, Yawu Liu, Markku Peltonen, Riitta Antikainen, Nina Kemppainen, Tiina Laatikainen, Jyrki Lötjönen, Juha Rinne, Timo Strandberg and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Ruth StephenInstitute of Clinical Medicine/Neurology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-3380-9530
Tiia NganduPublic Health Promotion Unit, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-3698-2021
Yawu LiuInstitute of Clinical Medicine/Neurology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-2386-3370
Markku PeltonenPublic Health Promotion Unit, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-3767-4223
Riitta AntikainenCenter for Life Course Health Research/Geriatrics, University of Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-5262-362X
Nina KemppainenDivision of Clinical Neurosciences, Turku University Hospital, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-8988-5858
Tiina LaatikainenInstitute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-6614-4782
Jyrki LötjönenCombinostics, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-8698-4340
Juha RinneDivision of Clinical Neurosciences, Turku University Hospital, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-6369-0764
Timo StrandbergCenter for Life Course Health Research/Geriatrics, University of Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-6299-925X
Jaakko TuomilehtoPublic Health Promotion Unit, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-1909-7407
Ritva VanninenInstitute of Clinical Medicine/Neurology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-2423-9350
Hilkka SoininenInstitute of Clinical Medicine/Neurology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-2785-9937
Miia KivipeltoInstitute of Clinical Medicine/Neurology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-0992-3875
Alina SolomonInstitute of Clinical Medicine/Neurology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-7166-9903
FINGER Study Group
University of Eastern Finland · FIUniversity of Turku · FIFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FIKarolinska Institutet · SEOulu University Hospital · FIUniversität für Weiterbildung Krems · ATUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

European Research Council 804371
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The CAIDE (Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Aging and Dementia) Risk Score is a validated tool estimating dementia risk. It was previously associated with imaging biomarkers. However, associations between dementia risk scores (including CAIDE) and dementia-related biomarkers have not been studied in the context of an intervention. This study investigated associations between change in CAIDE score and change in neuroimaging biomarkers (brain magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] and Pittsburgh Compound B-positron emission tomography [PiB-PET] measures) during the 2-year Finnish Geriatric Intervention Study to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability (FINGER) (post-hoc analyses). FINGER targeted at-risk older adults, aged 60-77 years, from the general population. Participants were randomized to either multidomain intervention (diet, exercise, cognitive training, and vascular risk management) or control group (general health advice). Neuroimaging (MRI and PiB-PET) data from baseline and 2-year visits were used. A toal of 112 participants had repeated brain MRI measures (hippocampal, total gray matter, and white matter lesion volumes, and Alzheimer's disease signature cortical thickness). Repeated PiB-PET scans were available for 39 participants. Reduction in CAIDE score (indicating lower dementia risk) during the intervention was associated with less decline in hippocampus volume in the intervention group, but not the control group (Randomization group × CAIDE change interaction β coefficient = -0.40, p = .02). Associations for other neuroimaging measures were not significant. The intervention may have benefits on hippocampal volume in individuals who succeed in improving their overall risk level as indicated by a reduction in CAIDE score. This exploratory finding requires further testing and validation in larger studies.

Indexed as

AgingBrain Cortical ThicknessDementiaHippocampusRisk Reduction BehaviorAgedCognitionCorrelation of DataFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHealth BehaviorHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuroimagingDementiaHippocampusPreventionRisk reduction

Identifiers

PMID33970268
PMCPMC8277089
OpenAlexW3161301064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.