Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33970195›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2021

Short-latency ocular following responses to motion stimuli are strongly affected by temporal modulations of the visual content during the initial fixation period.

Boris M Sheliga, Christian Quaia, Edmond J FitzGibbon, Bruce G Cumming

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 62% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Boris M SheligaLaboratory of Sensorimotor Research, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Christian QuaiaLaboratory of Sensorimotor Research, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Edmond J FitzGibbonLaboratory of Sensorimotor Research, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Bruce G CummingLaboratory of Sensorimotor Research, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
National Eye Institute · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Neuro-ophthalmic Mechanisms Of DiseaseZIAEY000388 · NEI · NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE · PI FITZGIBBON, EDMOND J · 2009 to 2023
$5.1M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuronal and psychophysical responses to a visual stimulus are known to depend on the preceding history of visual stimulation, but the effect of stimulation history on reflexive eye movements has received less attention. Here, we quantify these effects using short-latency ocular following responses (OFRs), a valuable tool for studying early motion processing. We recorded, in human subjects, the horizontal OFRs induced by drifting vertical 1D pink noise. The stimulus was preceded by 600 to 1000 ms of maintained fixation (on a visible cross), and we explored the effect of different stimuli ("fixation patterns") presented during the fixation period. We found that any temporal modulation present during the fixation period reduced the magnitude of the subsequent OFRs. Even changes in the overall luminance during the fixation period induced significant suppression. The magnitude of the effect was a function of both spatial and temporal structure of the fixation pattern. Suppression that was selective for both relative orientation and relative spatial frequency accounted for a considerable fraction of total suppression. Finally, changes in stimulus temporal structure alone (i.e. "flicker" versus "transparent motion") led to changes in the spatial frequency tuning of suppression. In the time domain, the suppression developed quickly: 100 ms of temporal modulation in the fixation pattern produced up to 80% of maximal suppression. Recovery from suppression was instead more gradual, taking up to several seconds. By presenting transparent motion during the fixation period, with opposite motion signals having different spatial frequency content, we also discovered a direction-selective component of suppression, which depended on both the frequency and the direction of the moving stimulus.

Indexed as

Motion PerceptionEye MovementsFixation, OcularHumansPhotic StimulationReaction TimeVision, Ocular

Identifiers

PMID33970195
PMCPMC8114009
OpenAlexW2892806803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.