Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33969889›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2021

U.S. trends in elective and emergent major abdominal surgical procedures from 2002 to 2014 in older adults.

Daniel S Rubin, Megan Huisingh-Scheetz, Mark K Ferguson, Peter Nagele, Carol J Peden, Diane S Lauderdale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Ensuring Goal-Aligned Care in a Busy Surgical Practice.Seminars in colon & rectal surgery · 2024
    Article
  5. Feeble, fallen, and forgetting: association of cognitive impairment and falls on outcomes of major intra-abdominal surgeries in older adults.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel S RubinDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0490-1186
Megan Huisingh-ScheetzSection of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Mark K FergusonDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Peter NageleDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8369-3858
Carol J PedenDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Diane S LauderdaleDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Funding

NOVEL STRATEGY FOR PERIOPERATIVE BETA-BLOCKER THERAPYR01HL126892 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI NAGELE, PETER · 2015 to 2019
$2.5M
Early Frailty Biomarkers: Patterns of Activity and Energy ExpenditureK23AG049106 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI HUISINGH-SCHEETZ, MEGAN J · 2016 to 2021
$924k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL126892NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL126892NIA NIH HHS K23 AG049106NIA NIH HHS K23AG049106
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe U.S. population is aging and projected to undergo an increasing number of general surgical procedures. However, recent trends in the frequency of major abdominal procedures in older adults are currently unknown as improvements in non-operative interventions may obviate the need for major surgery. Thus, we evaluated the trends of major abdominal surgical procedures in older adults in the United States.

methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study using the National Inpatient Sample from 2002 to 2014 with trend analysis using National Cancer Institute's Joinpoint Trend Analysis Software. We identified the average annual percent change (AAPC) in the yearly frequency of major abdominal surgical procedures in older adults (≥50 years of age).

resultsOur cohort included a total of 3,951,947 survey-weighted discharges that included a major abdominal surgery in adults ≥50 years of age between 2002 and 2014. Of these discharges, 2,529,507 (64.0%) were for elective abdominal surgeries, 2,062,835 (52.0%) were for female patients, and mean (SD) age was 61.4 (15.9) years. The frequency of major abdominal procedures (elective and emergent) decreased for adults aged 65-74 (AAPC: -1.43, -1.75, -1.11, p < 0.0001), 75-84 (AAPC: -2.75, -3.33, -2.16, p < 0.001), and ≥85 (AAPC: -4.07, -4.67, -3.47, p < 0.0001). The AAPC for elective procedures decreased for older adults aged 75-84 (AAPC = -1.65; -2.44, -0.85: p = 0.0001) and >85 (AAPC = -3.53; -4.57, -2.48: p < 0.0001). All age groups showed decreases in emergent procedures in 50-64 (AAPC = -1.76, -2.00, -1.52, p < 0.0001), 65-74 (AAPC = -3.59, -4.03, -3.14, p < 0.0001), 75-84 (AAPC = -3.90, -4.34, -3.46, p < 0.0001), ≥85 (AAPC = -4.58, -4.98, -4.17, p < 0.0001) age groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cohort of older adults, the frequency of emergent and elective major abdominal procedures in adults ≥65 years of age decreased with significant variation among individual procedure types. Future studies are needed to identify the generalizability of our findings to other surgical procedures.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overDigestive System Surgical ProceduresElective Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesUnited Statesacute care surgeryElixhauser comorbidity scoregeriatric surgerymajor abdominal surgical procedure

Identifiers

PMID33969889
PMCPMC8373714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.