Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33969621›Full record

ArticleColorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland2021

The learning curve of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer is associated with local recurrence: results from a multicentre external audit.

Stefan E Van Oostendorp, H J Eric Belgers, Jeroen C Hol, Pascal G Doornebosch, Eric J Th Belt, Steven J Oosterling, Miranda Kusters, H J Jaap Bonjer, Colin Sietses, Jurriaan B Tuynman

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Essential Updates 2024-2026: Advances in Colorectal Cancer Surgery.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Local Recurrence of Rectal Cancer After Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision and Risk Factors: A Nationwide Multicenter Cohort Study in Japan.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Incidence and Risk Factors of Surgical Complications and Anastomotic Leakage After Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision for Middle and Low Rectal Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Stefan E Van OostendorpDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6969-7956
H J Eric BelgersDepartment of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Jeroen C HolDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4481-7250
Pascal G DoorneboschDepartment of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle a/d Ijssel, The Netherlands.
Eric J Th BeltDepartment of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Steven J OosterlingDepartment of Surgery, Spaarne Gasthuis, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands.
Miranda KustersDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
H J Jaap BonjerDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9124-3483
Colin SietsesDepartment of Surgery, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, The Netherlands.
Jurriaan B TuynmanDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5952-8000
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLZiekenhuis Gelderse Vallei · NLAlbert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis · NLIJsselland Ziekenhuis · NLSpaarne Ziekenhuis · NLZuyderland Medisch Centrum · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTransanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) has been suggested as a potential solution for the resection of challenging mid and low rectal cancer. This relatively complex procedure has been implemented in many centres over the last years, despite the absence of long-term safety data. Recently, concern has arisen because of an increase in local recurrence in the implementation phase. The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between accumulated experience and local recurrences.

methodAn independent clinical researcher performed an external audit of consecutive series of all TaTME procedures in six centres in the Netherlands. Kaplan-Meier estimated local recurrence rates were calculated and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis performed to assess risk factors for local recurrence. Primary outcome was the local recurrence rate in the initial implementation (cases 1-10), continued adoption (cases 11-40) and prolonged experience (case 41 onward).

resultsSix hundred and twenty-four consecutive patients underwent TaTME for rectal cancer with a median follow-up of 27 months (range 1-82 months). The estimated 2- and 3-year local recurrence rates were 4.6% and 6.6%, respectively. Cox proportional hazards regression revealed procedural experience to be an independent factor in multivariate analysis next to advanced stage (ycMRF+, pT3-4, pN+) and pelvic sepsis. Corrected analysis projected the 3-year local recurrence rates to be 9.7%, 3.3% and 3.5% for the implementation, continued adoption and prolonged experience cohorts, respectively.

conclusionThis multicentre study shows a high local recurrence rate (12.5%) after implementation of TaTME which lowers to an acceptable rate (3.4%) when experience increases. Therefore, intensified proctoring and further precautions must be implemented to reduce the unacceptably high risk of local recurrence at units starting this technique.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyRectal NeoplasmsTransanal Endoscopic SurgeryHumansLearning CurveNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPostoperative ComplicationsRectumTreatment Outcomelearninglocal recurrencerectal cancerTaTMEtotal mesorectal excisiontransanal

Identifiers

PMID33969621
PMCPMC8453958
OpenAlexW3161837720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.