Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33969593›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical practice2021

Development of a novel risk score for the prediction of critical illness amongst COVID-19 patients.

Ioannis Bellos, Panagiota Lourida, Aikaterini Argyraki, Eleni Korompoki, Christina Zirou, Ioanna Kokkinaki, Angelos Pefanis

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ioannis BellosDepartment of Internal Medicine, "Sotiria" General and Chest Diseases Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5088-5458
Panagiota LouridaDepartment of Internal Medicine, "Sotiria" General and Chest Diseases Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Aikaterini ArgyrakiDepartment of Internal Medicine, "Sotiria" General and Chest Diseases Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Eleni KorompokiDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Alexandra" General Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Christina ZirouDepartment of Internal Medicine, "Sotiria" General and Chest Diseases Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Ioanna KokkinakiDepartment of Internal Medicine, "Sotiria" General and Chest Diseases Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Angelos PefanisDepartment of Internal Medicine, "Sotiria" General and Chest Diseases Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Sotiria General Hospital · GRNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCoronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) is associated with various clinical manifestations, ranging from asymptomatic infection to critical illness. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical and laboratory characteristics of hospitalised COVID-19 patients and construct a predictive model for the discrimination of patients at risk of disease progression.

methodsA single-centre cohort study was conducted including consecutively patients with COVID-19. Demographic, clinical and laboratory findings were prospectively collected at admission. The primary outcome of interest was the intensive care unit admission. A risk model was constructed by applying a Cox's proportional hazard's model with elastic net penalty. Its diagnostic performance was assessed by receiver operating characteristic analysis and was compared with conventional pneumonia severity scores.

resultsFrom a total of 67 patients 15 progressed to critical illness. The risk score included patients' gender, presence of hypertension and diabetes mellitus, fever, shortness of breath, serum glucose, aspartate aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, C-reactive protein and fibrinogen. Its predictive accuracy was estimated to be high (area under the curve: 97.1%), performing better than CURB-65, CRB-65 and PSI/PORT scores. Its sensitivity and specificity were estimated to be 92.3% and 93.3%, respectively, at the optimal threshold of 1.6.

conclusionsA10-variable risk score was constructed based on clinical and laboratory characteristics in order to predict critical illness amongst hospitalised COVID-19 patients, achieving better discrimination compared with traditional pneumonia severity scores. The proposed risk model should be externally validated in independent cohorts in order to ensure its prognostic efficacy.

Indexed as

COVID-19Critical IllnessCohort StudiesHumansPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSARS-CoV-2Severity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID33969593
PMCPMC7883033
OpenAlexW3111948748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.