Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33969520›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2021

Vaccine adverse event enrichment tests.

Shuoran Li, Lili Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shuoran LiDepartment of Statistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Lili ZhaoDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6366-8206

Funding

Incorporation of multilevel ontologies of adverse events and vaccines for vaccine safety surveillanceR01AI158543 · NIAID · WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL RESEARCH INST · PI ZHAO, LILI · 2021 to 2025
$1.8M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI158543
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccination safety is critical for individual and public health. Many existing methods have been used to conduct safety studies with the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) database. However, these methods frequently identify many adverse event (AE) signals and they are often hard to interpret in a biological context. The AE ontology introduces biologically meaningful structures to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database by connecting similar AEs, which provides meaningful interpretation for the underlying safety issues. In this paper, we develop rigorous statistical methods to identify "interesting" AE groups by performing AE enrichment analysis. We extend existing gene enrichment tests to perform AE enrichment analysis, while incorporating the special features of the AE data. The proposed methods were evaluated using simulation studies and were further illustrated on two studies using VAERS data. The proposed methods were implemented in R package AEenrich and can be installed from the Comprehensive R Archive Network, CRAN, and source code are available at https://github.com/umich-biostatistics/AEenrich.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsVaccinesDatabases, FactualHumansProbabilityUnited StatesVaccinationVaccinesenrichment analysisMedDRAvaccine adverse eventvaccine safetyVAERS

Identifiers

PMID33969520
PMCPMC8487909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.