ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2021
Comparisons of urea or ammonium on growth and fermentative metabolism of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in ethanol fermentation.
Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Coupling bacterial nitrogen fixation to yeast whole-cell biocatalysis enables amine production using air as the sole nitrogen source.Microbial cell factories · 2026Article
- Bioethanol production using sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) juice as substrate by stress-tolerant yeast strains isolated from Areke.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Integrating pH Value and Base Consumption in Online Monitoring of Organic Acid Production.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Advancing hybrid modeling of Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation with mixed carbon sources and urea in a mini-stirred tank reactor.Bioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2025Article
- Endochitinase and Chitobiosidase Production by MarineBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Engineering the methylotrophic yeastFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This work was mainly about the understanding of how urea and ammonium affect growth, glucose consumption and ethanol production of S. cerevisiae, in particular regarding the basic physiology of cell. The basic physiology of cell included intracellular pH, ATP, NADH and enzyme activity. Results showed that fermentation time was reduced by 19% when using urea compared with ammonium. The maximal ethanol production rate using urea was 1.14 g/L/h, increasing 30% comparing with the medium prepared with ammonium. Moreover, urea could decrease the synthesis of glycerol from glucose by 26% comparing with ammonium. The by-product of acetic acid yields decreased from 40 mmol/mol of glucose (with urea) to 24 mmol/mol of glucose (with ammonium). At the end of ethanol fermentation, cell number and pH were greater with urea than ammonium. Comparing with urea, ammonium decreased the intracellular pH by 14% (from 7.1 to 6.1). Urease converting urea into ammonia resulted in a more than 50% lower of ATP when comparing with ammonium. The values of NADH/DCW were 0.21 mg/g and 0.14 mg/g respectively with urea and ammonium, suggesting a 33% lower NADH. The enzyme activity of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was 0.0225 and 0.0275 U/mg protein respectively with urea and ammonium, which was consistent with the yields of glycerol.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.