ArticleInteractive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2021
Propofol pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics-a perspective in minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation.
Article in Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation versus conventional cardiopulmonary bypass in cardiac surgery: a contemporary systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2025Pooled it
- A Trends Analysis and Scoping Review: Minimal Invasive Extracorporeal Circulation.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2026Review
- Article
- TiMikrochimica acta · 2023Article
- Tonic down-rolling and eccentric down-positioning of eyes under sevoflurane anesthesia without non-depolarizing muscle relaxant and its relationship with depth of anesthesia.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is limited evidence as to the pharmacokinetic changes expected in adults with extracorporeal technologies. Drugs may be taken up by various components of the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit itself. Issues include the increased volume of the circuit leading to haemodilution; the sequestration of lipophilic drugs within the circuit tubing; and the absorption of proteins, especially albumin, onto the circuit, which can result in increased free drug. However, in this context, the aspect of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics during minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation has not been described and evidenced by scientific studies. In this single-centre control study of 60 patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting, we present the results focused on postoperative albumin values and intraoperative propofol dosages in patients undergoing surgery with minimally invasive (n = 30) versus conventional extracorporeal circulation (n = 30). In the minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation group, a lower propofol dosage titrated to a bispectral index of 40-45 was used during coronary artery bypass grafting, and an improvement of postoperative concentration of serum albumin was observed compared to the conventional extracorporeal circulation group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.