SynthesisAlcohol and alcoholism (Oxford, Oxfordshire)2022
Using Machine Learning to Identify and Investigate Moderators of Alcohol Use Intervention Effects in Meta-Analyses.
Synthesis in Alcohol and alcoholism (Oxford, Oxfordshire), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsTo illustrate a machine learning-based approach for identifying and investigating moderators of alcohol use intervention effects in aggregate-data meta-analysis.
methodsWe illustrated the machine learning technique of random forest modeling using data from an ongoing meta-analysis of brief substance use interventions implemented in general healthcare settings. A subset of 40 trials testing brief alcohol interventions (BAIs) was used; these trials provided 344 estimates of post-intervention effects on participants' alcohol use as well as data on 20 potential moderators of intervention effects. These candidate moderators included characteristics of trial methodology and implementation, intervention design and participant samples.
resultsThe best-fitting random forest model identified 10 important moderators from the pool of 20 candidate moderators. Meta-regression utilizing the selected moderators found that inclusion of prescriptive advice in a BAI session significantly moderated BAI effects on alcohol use. Observed effects were also significantly moderated by several methodological characteristics of trials, including the type of comparison group used, the overall level of attrition and the strategy used to address missing data. In a meta-regression model that included all candidate moderators, fewer coefficients were found to be significant, indicating that the use of a preliminary data reduction technique to identify only important moderators for inclusion in final analyses may have yielded improved statistical power to detect moderation.
conclusionsMachine learning methods can be valuable tools for clarifying the influence of trial, intervention and sample characteristics on alcohol use intervention effects, in particular when numerous candidate moderators are available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.