Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33969319›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Rheumatology2021

Surgical microdiscectomy versus transforaminal epidural steroid injection in patients with sciatica secondary to herniated lumbar disc (NERVES): a phase 3, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation.

Martin John Wilby, Ashley Best, Eifiona Wood, Girvan Burnside, Emma Bedson, Hannah Short, Dianne Wheatley, Daniel Hill-McManus, Manohar Sharma, Simon Clark and 7 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Rheumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06956664 (Comparative Efficacy of Physiotherapeutic Exercise Regimens Implemented After Caudal Epidural Steroid Injection), which is not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06956664 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Efficacy of Physiotherapeutic Exercise Regimens Implemented After Caudal Epidural Steroid Injection

TypeinterventionalSponsorÇankırı Karatekin UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled42ConditionsIntervertebral Disc Displacement, Low Back Pain, RadiculopathyArmsConventional Physiotherapy, Aerobic Exercise Programme, Core-Stabilization Exercise Programme
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. The Implementation of Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome (PSPS): Mechanism-Based Recommendations.Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. SupraneuralBJA open · 2023
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Is out-of-hours decompression for acute lumbar disc herniation associated with greater peri-operative complications? A tertiary centre, retrospective cohort study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Martin John WilbyDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Ashley BestLiverpool Clinical Trials Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Eifiona WoodCentre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
Girvan BurnsideLiverpool Clinical Trials Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Emma BedsonLiverpool Clinical Trials Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Hannah ShortLiverpool Clinical Trials Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Dianne WheatleyLiverpool Clinical Trials Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Daniel Hill-McManusCentre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
Manohar SharmaDepartment of Pain Medicine, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Simon ClarkDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Ganesan BaranidharanLeeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK.
Cathy PricePain Clinic, Solent NHS Trust, Highpoint Venue, Bursledon, Southampton, UK.
Richard MannionAcademic Division of Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Peter J HutchinsonAcademic Division of Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Dyfrig A HughesCentre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
Anthony MarsonDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Paula R WilliamsonLiverpool Clinical Trials Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe optimal invasive treatment for sciatica secondary to herniated lumbar disc remains controversial, with a paucity of evidence for use of non-surgical treatments such as transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) over surgical microdiscectomy. We aimed to investigate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of these options for management of radicular pain secondary to herniated lumbar disc.

methodsWe did a pragmatic, multicentre, phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial at 11 spinal units across the UK. Eligible patients were aged 16-65 years, had MRI-confirmed non-emergency sciatica secondary to herniated lumbar disc with symptom duration between 6 weeks and 12 months, and had leg pain that was not responsive to non-invasive management. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either TFESI or surgical microdiscectomy by an online randomisation system that was stratified by centre with random permuted blocks. The primary outcome was Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ) score at 18 weeks. All randomly assigned participants who completed a valid ODQ at baseline and at 18 weeks were included in the analysis. Safety analysis included all treated participants. Cost-effectiveness was estimated from the EuroQol-5D-5L, Hospital Episode Statistics, medication usage, and self-reported resource-use data. This trial was registered with ISRCTN, number ISRCTN04820368, and EudraCT, number 2014-002751-25.

findingsBetween March 6, 2015, and Dec 21, 2017, 163 (15%) of 1055 screened patients were enrolled, with 80 participants (49%) randomly assigned to the TFESI group and 83 participants (51%) to the surgery group. At week 18, ODQ scores were 30·02 (SD 24·38) for 63 assessed patients in the TFESI group and 22·30 (19·83) for 61 assessed patients in the surgery group. Mean improvement was 24·52 points (18·89) for the TFESI group and 26·74 points (21·35) for the surgery group, with an estimated treatment difference of -4·25 (95% CI -11·09 to 2·59; p=0·22). There were four serious adverse events in four participants associated with surgery, and none with TFESI. Compared with TFESI, surgery had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £38 737 per quality-adjusted life-year gained, and a 0·17 probability of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20 000 per quality-adjusted life-year.

interpretationFor patients with sciatica secondary to herniated lumbar disc, with symptom duration of up to 12 months, TFESI should be considered as a first invasive treatment option. Surgery is unlikely to be a cost-effective alternative to TFESI.

fundingHealth Technology Assessment programme of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), UK.

Identifiers

PMID33969319
PMCPMC8080892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.