ArticleBioMed research international2021
The Differences of Population Birth Defects in Epidemiology Analysis between the Rural and Urban Areas of Hunan Province in China, 2014-2018.
Article in BioMed research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic evaluation and clinical utility of C-MoKa for prenatal genetic testing.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Evidence of the correlation between air pollution and different types of birth defects: based on a distribution-lag non-linear model.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Prevalence and death rate of birth defects from population-based surveillance in Hunan Province, China, 2010-2020.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Multivariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors for birth defects: a study from population-based surveillance data.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Prevalence, characteristics and risk factors of birth defects in central China livebirths, 2015-2022.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Update from a cohort study for birth defects in Hunan Province, China, 2010-2020.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Birth defects data from hospital-based birth defect surveillance in Guilin, China, 2018-2020.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo compare the differences of epidemiology analysis in population birth defects (BDs) between the rural and urban areas of Hunan Province in China.
methodsThe data of population-based BDs in Liuyang county (rural) and Shifeng district (urban) in Hunan Province for 2014-2018 were analyzed. BD prevalence rates, percentage change, and annual percentage change (APC) by sex and age were calculated to evaluate time trends. Risk factors associated with BDs were assessed using simple and multiple logistic regression analyses.
resultsThe BD prevalence rate per 10,000 perinatal infants (PIs) was 220.54 (95% CI: 211.26-230.13) in Liuyang and 181.14 (95% CI: 161.18-202.87) in Shifeng. Significant decreasing trends in BD prevalence rates were noted in the female PIs (APC = -9.31,
conclusionsWe should focus on rural areas, reduce the prevalence of premature and low birth weight infants, and provide maternal healthcare services for migrant pregnancies for BD prevention from the perspective of population-based BD surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.