Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33969028›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2021

Agreement of Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Computed Tomography in the Assessment for Acute Skull Fractures in a Canine and Feline Cadaver Model.

Silke Hecht, Kimberly M Anderson, Aude Castel, John F Griffin, Adrien-Maxence Hespel, Nathan Nelson, Xiaocun Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Silke HechtDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United States.
Kimberly M AndersonDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United States.
Aude CastelDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United States.
John F GriffinDepartment of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
Adrien-Maxence HespelDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United States.
Nathan NelsonDepartment of Molecular and Biomedical Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.
Xiaocun SunOffice of Information Technology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) is the imaging modality of choice to evaluate patients with acute head trauma. However, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be chosen in select cases. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the agreement of MRI with CT in the assessment for presence or absence of acute skull fractures in a canine and feline cadaver model, compare seven different MRI sequences (T1-W, T2-W, T2-FLAIR, PD-W, T2

Indexed as

catCNSCTdogheadMRItrauma

Identifiers

PMID33969028
PMCPMC8100023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.