Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33968912›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2021

A Custom-Made Device for Reproducibly Depositing Pre-metered Doses of Nebulized Drugs on Pulmonary Cells

Justus C Horstmann, Chelsea R Thorn, Patrick Carius, Florian Graef, Xabier Murgia, Cristiane de Souza Carvalho-Wodarz, Claus-Michael Lehr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. On the path to predicting immune responses in the lung: Modeling the pulmonary innate immune system at the air-liquid interface (ALI).European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Justus C HorstmannHelmholtz Institute for Pharmaceutical Research Saarland (HIPS), Saarbrücken, Germany.
Chelsea R ThornClinical and Health Science, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Patrick CariusHelmholtz Institute for Pharmaceutical Research Saarland (HIPS), Saarbrücken, Germany.
Florian GraefHelmholtz Institute for Pharmaceutical Research Saarland (HIPS), Saarbrücken, Germany.
Xabier MurgiaHelmholtz Institute for Pharmaceutical Research Saarland (HIPS), Saarbrücken, Germany.
Cristiane de Souza Carvalho-WodarzHelmholtz Institute for Pharmaceutical Research Saarland (HIPS), Saarbrücken, Germany.
Claus-Michael LehrHelmholtz Institute for Pharmaceutical Research Saarland (HIPS), Saarbrücken, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The deposition of pre-metered doses (i.e., defined before and not after exposition) at the air-liquid interface of viable pulmonary epithelial cells remains an important but challenging task for developing aerosol medicines. While some devices allow quantification of the deposited dose after or during the experiment, e.g., gravimetrically, there is still no generally accepted way to deposit small pre-metered doses of aerosolized drugs or pharmaceutical formulations, e.g., nanomedicines. Here, we describe a straightforward custom-made device, allowing connection to commercially available nebulizers with standard cell culture plates. Designed to tightly fit into the approximately 12-mm opening of either a 12-well Transwell

Indexed as

aerosolair–liquid interfaceepithelial cellsinhalationpulmonary drug delivery

Identifiers

PMID33968912
PMCPMC8096921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.