Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33968890›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2021

Propagation Model of Panic Buying Under the Sudden Epidemic.

Peihua Fu, Bailu Jing, Tinggui Chen, Chonghuan Xu, Jianjun Yang, Guodong Cong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Peihua FuSchool of Management and E-Business, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou, China.
Bailu JingSchool of Management and E-Business, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou, China.
Tinggui ChenSchool of Statistics and Mathematics, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou, China.
Chonghuan XuSchool of Business Administration, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou, China.
Jianjun YangDepartment of Computer Science and Information Systems, University of North Georgia, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Guodong CongSchool of Tourism and Urban-Rural Planning, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou, China.
Zhejiang Gongshang University · CNUniversity of North Georgia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sudden outbreak of COVID-19 at the end of 2019 has had a huge impact on people's lives all over the world, and the overwhelmingly negative information about the epidemic has made people panic for the future. This kind of panic spreads and develops through online social networks, and further spreads to the offline environment, which triggers panic buying behavior and has a serious impact on social stability. In order to quantitatively study this behavior, a two-layer propagation model of panic buying behavior under the sudden epidemic is constructed. The model first analyzes the formation process of individual panic from a micro perspective, and then combines the Susceptible-Infected-Recovered (SIR) Model to simulate the spread of group behavior. Then, through simulation experiments, the main factors affecting the spread of panic buying behavior are discussed. The experimental results show that: (1) the dissipating speed of individual panics is related to the number of interactions and there is a threshold. When the number of individuals involved in interacting is equal to this threshold, the panic of the group dissipates the fastest, while the dissipation speed is slower when it is far from the threshold; (2) The reasonable external information release time will affect the occurrence of the second panic buying, meaning providing information about the availability of supplies when an escalation of epidemic is announced will help prevent a second panic buying. In addition, when the first panic buying is about to end, if the scale of the second panic buying is to be suppressed, it is better to release positive information after the end of the first panic buying, rather than ahead of the end; and (3) Higher conformity among people escalates panic, resulting in panic buying. Finally, two cases are used to verify the effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed model.

Indexed as

COVID-19EpidemicsConsumer BehaviorHumansPanicSARS-CoV-2behavior spreadgroup decision-makingpanic buyingpropagation modelsudden epidemic

Identifiers

PMID33968890
PMCPMC8100230
OpenAlexW3156075519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.