Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33968732›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

A Non-Invasive Scoring System to Differential Diagnosis of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (ccRCC) From Renal Angiomyolipoma Without Visible Fat (RAML-wvf) Based on CT Features.

Xiao-Jie Wang, Bai-Qiang Qu, Jia-Ping Zhou, Qiao-Mei Zhou, Yuan-Fei Lu, Yao Pan, Jian-Xia Xu, You-You Miu, Hong-Qing Wang, Ri-Sheng Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xiao-Jie WangDepartment of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Bai-Qiang QuDepartment of Radiology, Wenling Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Taizhou, China.
Jia-Ping ZhouDepartment of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Qiao-Mei ZhouDepartment of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Yuan-Fei LuDepartment of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Yao PanDepartment of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Jian-Xia XuDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
You-You MiuDepartment of Ultrasonic, Wenzhou Central Hospital, Wenzhou, China.
Hong-Qing WangDepartment of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Ri-Sheng YuDepartment of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRenal angiomyolipoma without visible fat (RAML-wvf) and clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) have many overlapping features on imaging, which poses a challenge to radiologists. This study aimed to create a scoring system to distinguish ccRCC from RAML-wvf using computed tomography imaging.

methodsA total of 202 patients from 2011 to 2019 that were confirmed by pathology with ccRCC (n=123) or RAML (n=79) were retrospectively analyzed by dividing them randomly into a training cohort (n=142) and a validation cohort (n=60). A model was established using logistic regression and weighted to be a scoring system. ROC, AUC, cut-off point, and calibration analyses were performed. The scoring system was divided into three ranges for convenience in clinical evaluations, and the diagnostic probability of ccRCC was calculated.

resultsFour independent risk factors are included in the system: 1) presence of a pseudocapsule, 2) a heterogeneous tumor parenchyma in pre-enhancement scanning, 3) a non-high CT attenuation in pre-enhancement scanning, and 4) a heterogeneous enhancement in CMP. The prediction accuracy had an ROC of 0.978 (95% CI, 0.956-0.999; P=0.011), similar to the primary model (ROC, 0.977; 95% CI, 0.954-1.000; P=0.012). A sensitivity of 91.4% and a specificity of 93.9% were achieved using 4.5 points as the cutoff value. Validation showed a good result (ROC, 0.922; 95% CI, 0.854-0.991, P=0.035). The number of patients with ccRCC in the three ranges (0 to <2 points; 2-4 points; >4 to ≤11 points) significantly increased with increasing scores.

conclusionThis scoring system is convenient for distinguishing between ccRCC and RAML-wvf using four computed tomography features.

Indexed as

clear cell renal cell carcinomacomputed tomographydifferential diagnosesrenal angiomyolipoma without visible fatscoring system

Identifiers

PMID33968732
PMCPMC8103199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.