Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33968679›Full record

ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2021

MiR-30b-3p and miR-126-3p of urinary extracellular vesicles could be new biomarkers for prostate cancer.

Kyosuke Matsuzaki, Kazutoshi Fujita, Eisuke Tomiyama, Koji Hatano, Yujiro Hayashi, Cong Wang, Yu Ishizuya, Yoshiyuki Yamamoto, Takuji Hayashi, Taigo Kato and 7 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kyosuke MatsuzakiDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Kazutoshi FujitaDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Eisuke TomiyamaDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Koji HatanoDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Yujiro HayashiDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Cong WangDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Yu IshizuyaDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Yoshiyuki YamamotoDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Takuji HayashiDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Taigo KatoDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Kentaro JingushiDepartment of Therapeutic Urologic Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Atsunari KawashimaDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Takeshi UjikeDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Akira NagaharaDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Motohide UemuraDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Kazutake TsujikawaLaboratory of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Science, Suita, Japan.
Norio NonomuraDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Osaka University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExtracellular vesicles (EVs) including exosomes are present in blood, urine, and saliva and contain proteins, microRNAs, and messenger RNAs. We investigated microRNAs in urinary EVs to discover new biomarkers of prostate cancer (PCa).

methodsWe isolated EVs from urine obtained following digital rectal examination (DRE) of 14 men with elevated levels of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) [negative biopsy (n=4) and PCa with Gleason scores of 6 (n=3), 7 (n=3), and 8-9 (n=4)]. MicroRNAs extracted from EVs were analyzed by microRNA microarray.

resultsMicroRNAs miR-30b-3p and miR-126-3p were identified as being overexpressed in urinary EVs of the PCa patients versus the biopsy-negative men, but no microRNAs were associated with the Gleason score. In the independent cohort as well, these two microRNAs were overexpressed in urinary EVs from the PCa patients versus the negative-biopsy men. Logistic regression analysis adjusted by age and PSA showed that these two microRNAs were significantly associated with the prediction of PCa in biopsy specimens. Sensitivity and specificity of miR-30b-3p and miR-126-3p for the prediction of PCa were 46.4% and 88.0% and 60.7% and 80.0%, respectively, which were better than those of serum PSA (53.5% and 64.0%, respectively).

conclusionsMiR-30b-3p and miR-126-3p in urinary EVs could be potential biomarkers of PCa.

Indexed as

Exosomesextracellular vesicles (EVs)microRNAprostate cancer (PCa)urine

Identifiers

PMID33968679
PMCPMC8100845
OpenAlexW3038825236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.