Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33968627›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2021

Systematic assessment of health care perception in adults with congenital heart disease in Germany.

Rhoia Neidenbach, Stephan Achenbach, Caroline Andonian, Ulrike M M Bauer, Peter Ewert, Sebastian Freilinger, Ulrike Gundlach, Ann-Sophie Kaemmerer, Nicole Nagdyman, Kathrin Nebel and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Rhoia NeidenbachDepartment of Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University Munich, Germany.
Stephan AchenbachDepartment of Cardiology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Germany.
Caroline AndonianDepartment of Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University Munich, Germany.
Ulrike M M BauerCompetence Network for Congenital Heart Defects, National Register for Congenital Heart Defects, Berlin, Germany.
Peter EwertDepartment of Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University Munich, Germany.
Sebastian FreilingerDepartment of Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University Munich, Germany.
Ulrike GundlachDepartment of Cardiology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Germany.
Ann-Sophie KaemmererDepartment of Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University Munich, Germany.
Nicole NagdymanDepartment of Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University Munich, Germany.
Kathrin NebelDepartment of Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University Munich, Germany.
Renate OberhofferDepartment of Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University Munich, Germany.
Lars PieperDepartment of Behavioral Epidemiology, Technical University of Dresden, Germany.
Wibke ReinhardDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University Munich, Germany.
Linda SanftenbergInstitute of General Practice, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Germany.
Fabian von ScheidtDepartment of Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University Munich, Germany.
Jörg SchellingLudwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Germany.
Lavinia SeidelDepartment of Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University Munich, Germany.
Michael WeyandDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Harald KaemmererDepartment of Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe number of adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) is steadily rising due to increased survival rate and improved medical resources. Accordingly, more than 330,000 ACHD are currently living in Germany. Almost all of them require lifelong specialized medical follow-up for their chronic heart disease, often accompanied by residua, sequelae, or comorbidities. Primary care physicians (PCPs) are a crucial factor in directing patients to ACHD specialists or specialized institutions, but despite all efforts, the number of ACHD under specialized care is low, the lost-to-follow-up rate is high, and the morbidity and mortality is substantial. The present cross-sectional study was designed to systematically characterize the health care of ACHD from a patient perspective, including (I) use of medical care by ACHD, (II) medical counselling needs, and (III) perceived satisfaction with health care.

methodsThe German-wide analysis was based on a 25-item questionnaire designed to address different aspects of medical status and health issues of ACHD from their own perspective, performed between May of 2017 and July of 2020.

resultsA total of 4,008 ACHD (52% female; mean age 41.9±17.2 years) completed the questionnaire. The majority of ACHD (3,524, 87.9%) reported, that they consulted their PCP for non-cardiac health problems, and 49.7% (n=1,991) consulted their PCP also for medical problems associated with the underlying CHD. Almost all ACHD reported a need for medical advice concerning exercise capacity and daily life activities, occupational skills, pregnancy, rehabilitation, genetic counselling, insurance, and retirement. A total of 1,840 (45.9%) patients were not aware of the existence of certified ACHD specialists or centers. Moreover, 2,552 (67.6%) of those surveyed were uninformed about patient organizations for ACHD.

conclusionsThe present study demonstrates that ACHD are largely uninformed about the ACHD care structures available nationwide, although the patients have a great need for specialized follow-up, advice, and care.

Indexed as

Adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD)congenital heart disease (CHD)general practitionersmedical health supplyprimary care physicians (PCPs)primary health care

Identifiers

PMID33968627
PMCPMC8102265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.