ArticleCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2021
Systematic assessment of health care perception in adults with congenital heart disease in Germany.
Article in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating optimal patient-centered care: patient- and family-reported experiences after complex treatment for rare diseases.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2026Article
- Self-Care Behaviors and Its Associated Factors in Adult Congenital Heart Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- Dual Disease Burden: Growing Older with Congenital Heart Disease and Hereditary Metabolic and Connective Tissue Disorders-Data from the PATHFINDER-CHD Registry on Heart Failure.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Cardiological rehabilitation, prehabilitation, and cardiovascular prevention in adults with congenital heart defects: tasks and services of the German Pension Insurance-part 1: preventive cardiology and prehabilitation.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2025Review
- Continuous Long-Term Assessment of Heart Rate Variability in Adults with Cyanotic Congenital Heart Disease after Surgical Repair.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- PATHFINDER-CHD: prospective registry on adults with congenital heart disease, abnormal ventricular function, and/or heart failure as a foundation for establishing rehabilitative, prehabilitative, preventive, and health-promoting measures: rationale, aims, design and methods.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Article
- Review
- Effects of Sports, Exercise Training, and Physical Activity in Children with Congenital Heart Disease-A Review of the Published Evidence.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- [Cardiac MRI of congenital heart disease : From fetus to adult].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2022Review
- Ambulatory Care in Adult Congenital Heart Disease-Time for Change?Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- [Care of adults with congenital heart diseases in Germany-Leading role by internal medicine specialists and general practitioners].Der Internist · 2022Review
- Medical treatment of pulmonary hypertension in adults with congenital heart disease: updated and extended results from the International COMPERA-CHD Registry.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2021Article
- 'Well-being paradox' revisited: a cross-sectional study of quality of life in over 4000 adults with congenital heart disease.BMJ open · 2021Observational
- Caring for Adults with Congenital Heart Disease in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study of Generalist Health Care Professionals' Experiences.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe number of adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) is steadily rising due to increased survival rate and improved medical resources. Accordingly, more than 330,000 ACHD are currently living in Germany. Almost all of them require lifelong specialized medical follow-up for their chronic heart disease, often accompanied by residua, sequelae, or comorbidities. Primary care physicians (PCPs) are a crucial factor in directing patients to ACHD specialists or specialized institutions, but despite all efforts, the number of ACHD under specialized care is low, the lost-to-follow-up rate is high, and the morbidity and mortality is substantial. The present cross-sectional study was designed to systematically characterize the health care of ACHD from a patient perspective, including (I) use of medical care by ACHD, (II) medical counselling needs, and (III) perceived satisfaction with health care.
methodsThe German-wide analysis was based on a 25-item questionnaire designed to address different aspects of medical status and health issues of ACHD from their own perspective, performed between May of 2017 and July of 2020.
resultsA total of 4,008 ACHD (52% female; mean age 41.9±17.2 years) completed the questionnaire. The majority of ACHD (3,524, 87.9%) reported, that they consulted their PCP for non-cardiac health problems, and 49.7% (n=1,991) consulted their PCP also for medical problems associated with the underlying CHD. Almost all ACHD reported a need for medical advice concerning exercise capacity and daily life activities, occupational skills, pregnancy, rehabilitation, genetic counselling, insurance, and retirement. A total of 1,840 (45.9%) patients were not aware of the existence of certified ACHD specialists or centers. Moreover, 2,552 (67.6%) of those surveyed were uninformed about patient organizations for ACHD.
conclusionsThe present study demonstrates that ACHD are largely uninformed about the ACHD care structures available nationwide, although the patients have a great need for specialized follow-up, advice, and care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.