Article3 Biotech2021
Prokaryotic diversity of tropical coastal sand dunes ecosystem using metagenomics.
Article in 3 Biotech, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bacterial diversity in the aquatic system in India based on metagenome analysis-a critical review.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2023Review
- High Proportions of Radiation-Resistant Strains in Culturable Bacteria from the Taklimakan Desert.Biology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coastal sand dunes (CSDs), unique, stressed and hostile habitats act as a barrier between marine and terrestrial ecosystems. CSDs are stressed in terms of nutrition and fluctuating physio-chemical conditions. CSD is classified into several types, each of which presents different challenges for life forms. This study focuses on exploring bacterial and archaeal diversity and community structure in four CSD namely, Embryo, Fore, Gray, and Mature dunes of Keri beach, Goa along the west coast of India. The study was carried out using Next Generation Sequencing of hypervariable V3-V4 regions of the 16S rRNA gene using Illumina HiSeq platform. The present study hypothesizes that the prokaryotic communities at each dune may be different and could have different role in the ecosystem. The NGS for Embryo, Fore, Gray, and Mature dunes gave 1,045,447, 1,451,753, 1,321,867, and 1,537,758 paired-end reads, respectively, out of which 54,500, 50,032, 37,819, and 111,186 were retained through various quality filtrations. A total of 74, 63, 65, and 65% of OTUs, respectively, remained unknown at the species level. The highest bacterial and archaeal abundance was reported from Mature and Embryo dunes, respectively. Phylum Actinobacteria dominated the Embryo, Fore, and Mature dunes, whereas phylum Proteobacteria was the dominant in the Gray dune. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13205-021-02809-5.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.