Article3 Biotech2021
Impact of nanochitosan and
Article in 3 Biotech, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nanoformulated thymol loaded chitosan conjugates as potent antibacterials against Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae.Discover nano · 2026Article
- Bacillus subtilis and chitosan nanoparticles enhance potato virus Y (PVY) tolerance in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) via modulation of antioxidants and secondary metabolites.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Improving Sugarcane Biomass and Phosphorus Fertilization Through Phosphate-Solubilizing Bacteria: A Photosynthesis-Based Approach.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Chitosan Nanoparticles: An Alternative for In Vitro Multiplication of Sugarcane (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Tomato Biostimulation with Nanochitosan-Iodine Complexes: Enhancing Antioxidant Metabolism.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Emerging Nanochitosan for Sustainable Agriculture.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Synergistic impact of nanomaterials and plant probiotics in agriculture: A tale of two-way strategy for long-term sustainability.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Review
- Enhanced legume growth and adaptation to degraded estuarine soils usingFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Article
- Impact of nanophos in agriculture to improve functional bacterial community and crop productivity.BMC plant biology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The role of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria along with nanochitosan on maize productivity remains unexplored. In the present study we report the effect of nanochitosan and PGPR on growth, productivity and mechanism(s) involved in defence response in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13205-021-02790-z.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.