ArticleCurrent pathobiology reports2020
Acceleration of PDE-Based Biological Simulation Through the Development of Neural Network Metamodels.
Article in Current pathobiology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewPartial differential equation (PDE) mathematical models of biological systems and the simulation approaches used to solve them are widely used to test hypotheses and infer regulatory interactions based on optimization of the PDE model against the observed data. In this review, we discuss the ability of powerful machine learning methods to accelerate the parametric screening of biophysical informed- PDE systems. RECENT
findingsA major shortcoming in more broad adaptation of PDE-based models is the high computational complexity required to solve and optimize the models and it requires many simulations to traverse the very high-dimensional parameter spaces during model calibration and inference tasks. For instance, when scaling up to tens of millions of simulations for optimization and sensitivity analysis of the PDE models, compute times quickly extend from months to years for sufficient coverage to solve the problems. For many systems, this brute-force approach is simply not feasible. Recently, neural network metamodels have been shown to be an efficient way to accelerate PDE model calibration and here we look at the benefits and limitations in extending the PDE acceleration methods to improve optimization and sensitivity analysis. SUMMARY: We use an example simulation to quantitatively and qualitatively show how neural network metamodels can be accurate and fast and demonstrate their potential for optimization of complex spatiotemporal problems in biology. We expect these approaches will be broadly applied to speed up scientific research and discovery in biology and other systems that can be described by complex PDE systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.