ReviewNeurology. Clinical practice2021
Genetic Testing for Parkinson Disease: Are We Ready?
Review in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Does genetic testing remain relevant in advanced Parkinson's disease?Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026Review
- Return of genetic results to persons with Parkinson's disease: Blessing or foe?Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2026Review
- Unravelling the novel insights between miR-7 and Parkinson's disease (PD).Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Review
- Disease-Modifying Trials in Treated Parkinson's Disease: "Stable Treated" Does Not Equate with Biological Stability.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2025Review
- Patient perceptions of genetic counselors' role and emotional support needs in adults with Parkinson's disease.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Participant-reported personal utility of genetic testing for Parkinson's disease and interest in clinical trial participation.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2024Article
- Genetics in Parkinson's disease, state-of-the-art and future perspectives.British medical bulletin · 2024Review
- Parkinson's Disease is Predominantly a Genetic Disease.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2024Review
- Genetic Testing for Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders in Less Privileged Areas: Barriers and Opportunities.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2024Article
- User and Usability Testing of a Web-Based Genetics Education Tool for Parkinson Disease: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR bioinformatics and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Genetic Testing in Parkinson's Disease.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2023Article
- Genetic Testing forMovement disorders clinical practice · 2023Article
- International Genetic Testing and Counseling Practices for Parkinson's Disease.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2023Article
- Genetics and Pathogenesis of Parkinson's Syndrome.Annual review of pathology · 2023Review
- Tools for communicating risk for Parkinson's disease.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2022Article
- The understanding of Parkinson's disease through genetics and new therapies.Brain and behavior · 2022Article
- Monogenic Parkinson's Disease: Genotype, Phenotype, Pathophysiology, and Genetic Testing.Genes · 2022Review
- The commercial genetic testing landscape for Parkinson's disease.Parkinsonism & related disorders · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewWith the advent of precision medicine and demand for genomic testing information, we may question whether it is time to offer genetic testing to our patients with Parkinson disease (PD). This review updates the current genetic landscape of PD, describes what genetic testing may offer, provides strategies for evaluating whom to test, and provides resources for the busy clinician. RECENT
findingsPatients with PD and their relatives, in various settings, have expressed an interest in learning their PD genetic status; however, physicians may be hesitant to widely offer testing due to the perceived low clinical utility of PD genetic test results. The rise of clinical trials available for patients with gene-specific PD and emerging information on genotype-phenotype correlations are starting to shift this discussion about testing. SUMMARY: By learning more about the various genetic testing options for PD and utility of results for patients and their care, clinicians may become more comfortable with widespread PD genetic testing in the research and clinical setting.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.