Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33968470›Full record

ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2021

Inpatient vs Outpatient Evaluation of Suspected Paraneoplastic Cerebellar Degeneration.

Natalie Witek, Mitra Afshari, Yuanqing Liu, Bichun Ouyang, Deborah Hall

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 55% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Natalie WitekDivision of Movement Disorders (NW, MA, DH), Rush University Medical Center, and Biostatistical Analysis (YL, BO), Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
Mitra AfshariDivision of Movement Disorders (NW, MA, DH), Rush University Medical Center, and Biostatistical Analysis (YL, BO), Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
Yuanqing LiuDivision of Movement Disorders (NW, MA, DH), Rush University Medical Center, and Biostatistical Analysis (YL, BO), Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
Bichun OuyangDivision of Movement Disorders (NW, MA, DH), Rush University Medical Center, and Biostatistical Analysis (YL, BO), Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
Deborah HallDivision of Movement Disorders (NW, MA, DH), Rush University Medical Center, and Biostatistical Analysis (YL, BO), Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
Rush University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the differences in outcomes of adult patients with ataxia initially evaluated for paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration (PCD) as inpatients or outpatients.

methodsIn this retrospective cohort analysis, diagnosis, workup, and functional outcomes based on the change in the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score were compared between patients with ataxia who underwent workup for PCD initially as inpatients vs outpatients between March 2011 and June 2018 at Rush University Medical Center.

resultsThere were 78 patients included in the analysis; 59% were women, and the average age at symptom onset was 57 ± 19.5 years. Nineteen patients (24.3%) underwent evaluation as inpatients and 59 (75.6%) as outpatients. Admitted patients were more likely to receive immunotherapy (73.7% vs 20.3%,

conclusionsMore patients improved from baseline in the inpatient cohort. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that for patients undergoing initial evaluation for PCD, patients undergoing inpatient evaluation have better outcomes compared with those undergoing outpatient evaluation.

Identifiers

PMID33968470
PMCPMC8101295
OpenAlexW3022338701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.