ReviewJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2021
Narrative review of cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal metastases in ovarian cancer.
Review in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Morbidity after secondary cytoreductive surgery with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for ovarian cancer: An analysis of a randomized phase II trial.Gynecologic oncology · 2023Trial
- [Experience of cytoreduction with peritonectomy and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in ovarian cancer].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2023Observational
- Identification of upregulated exosomal miRNAs between A2780 and A2780/DDP human ovarian cancer cells by high-throughput sequencing.Journal of ovarian research · 2023Article
- Review
- Ovarian cancer with peritoneal metastases has many treatment options and HIPEC is here to stay.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Due to numerous factors, such as no specific symptoms and ineffective screening to identify premalignant or early-stage disease, most patients with ovarian cancer present with advanced-stage disease and overt peritoneal metastases. Currently, the most effective treatment for these patients is complete cytoreductive surgery with systemic platinum/taxane-based chemotherapy. Over the past few decades, many researchers have evaluated the use of postoperative normothermic intraperitoneal (NIPEC) and intraoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) delivery as additional treatment modalities. Here, we will review the current status and future directions for these treatment strategies in the management of ovarian cancer. Most of the studies in this area of research have been retrospective in nature, limited by heterogeneous patient populations and large variance in chemotherapeutic regimens used, leading to mixed results and difficulties in evaluating the clinical impact of the data. More mature data from prospective trials are lacking, and IP therapy for advanced ovarian cancer should still be considered an investigational approach and evaluated only in clinical trials; the exception is for patients with stage III disease who undergo interval debulking surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, for whom HIPEC can be considered in selected patients as part of first-line therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.