Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33968423›Full record

ReviewJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2021

Review of management and treatment of peritoneal metastases from gastric cancer origin.

Israel Manzanedo, Fernando Pereira, Ángel Serrano, Estíbalitz Pérez-Viejo

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Role of surgery in metastatic gastric cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Knowledgeable case selection results in favorable outcomes.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Israel ManzanedoDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Unit, Hospital of Fuenlabrada, Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain.
Fernando PereiraDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Unit, Hospital of Fuenlabrada, Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain.
Ángel SerranoDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Unit, Hospital of Fuenlabrada, Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain.
Estíbalitz Pérez-ViejoDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Unit, Hospital of Fuenlabrada, Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain.
Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada · ESUniversidad Rey Juan Carlos · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastric cancer (GC) is the third cause of cancer-related deaths in the world, with less than 25% survivors at 5 years. These results are largely related to the high incidence of peritoneal metastases (PM) in these patients. Nowadays, the standard treatment for GC with PM is palliative systemic chemotherapy (SCT) with a survival of 6 months. From the 2000s, the combination of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been gaining popularity for different neoplastic diseases that involve the peritoneal surface. The use of CRS and HIPEC has been studied for GC with PM, with promising results in selected patients, obtaining survival rates never seen before. Moreover, HIPEC and other intraperitoneal chemotherapy techniques have been used to prevent peritoneal recurrences in patients diagnosed on locally advanced GC without macroscopic PM (adjuvant or prophylactic HIPEC). Even, intraperitoneal chemotherapy [laparoscopic HIPEC and neoadjuvant intraperitoneal and systemic chemotherapy (NIPS)] has been used as neoadjuvant treatment to reduce peritoneal disease burden in order to improve the rate of patients in whom complete cytoreduction can be achieved. Finally, patients with high volume peritoneal disease can be treated by palliative intraperitoneal chemotherapy to control the symptoms resulting from malignant ascites, using laparoscopic HIPEC or pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). This review aims to update the management of PM from GC origin in these different clinical scenarios, based on the literature and the experience of the authors.

Indexed as

cytoreductive surgery (CRS)early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC)Gastric cancer (GC)hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC)peritoneal metastases (PM)pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC)

Identifiers

PMID33968423
PMCPMC8100722
OpenAlexW3044422488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.