Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33968354›Full record

ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2021

A Hybrid MADM Model for Newly Graduated Nurse's Competence Evaluation and Improvement.

Fengmin Cheng, Yanjun Jin, Ching-Wen Chien, Lei Xiong, Yen-Ching Chuang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fengmin ChengTaizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, China.
Yanjun JinTaizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, China.
Ching-Wen ChienInstitute for Hospital Management, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen Campus, Beijing, China.
Lei XiongSchool of Architecture and Applied Art, Guangzhou Academy of Fine Arts, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5398-415X
Yen-Ching ChuangInstitute of Public Health & Emergency Management, Taizhou University, Taizhou, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1136-8727

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nursing departments in hospitals must evaluate the practical competency of newly graduated nurses and assist them to increase their competence. Competency assessments often consider multiple qualitative attributes and use expert knowledge as the basis for decision-making. This study proposes a hybrid multiple attribute decision-making (MADM) model that determines practical competency of the newly graduated nurse as an evaluation framework. A causal influence-network diagram (CIND) and influential weights are obtained from nursing experts' clinical experience using the decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL)-based analytical network process analysis (DANP). The MOORA-AS method is then used to evaluate the ability expectation ratio-gap for newly graduated nurses in practice. The CIND is used to allow each newly graduated nurse to reduce the performance ratio-gaps between the current level and the aspirational level from a systematic perspective. The empirical data applies to a third-class and a first-class hospital in China. The results show that the proposed hybrid MADM model has reliable results and allows nursing department decision-makers/managers to easily evaluate and systematically improve competencies for newly graduated nurses.

Indexed as

NursesChinaHumans

Identifiers

PMID33968354
PMCPMC8082270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.