Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33968139›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2021

Cryopreservation Preserves Cell-Type Composition and Gene Expression Profiles in Bone Marrow Aspirates From Multiple Myeloma Patients.

Duojiao Chen, Mohammad I Abu Zaid, Jill L Reiter, Magdalena Czader, Lin Wang, Patrick McGuire, Xiaoling Xuei, Hongyu Gao, Kun Huang, Rafat Abonour and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Single-Cell RNA Sequencing of Ewing Sarcoma Tumors Demonstrates Transcriptional Heterogeneity and Clonal Evolution.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Duojiao ChenDepartment of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Mohammad I Abu ZaidDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Jill L ReiterDepartment of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Magdalena CzaderDepartment of Pathology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Lin WangDepartment of Pathology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Patrick McGuireDepartment of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Xiaoling XueiDepartment of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Hongyu GaoDepartment of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Kun HuangCenter for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Rafat AbonourDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Brian A WalkerDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Yunlong LiuDepartment of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USIndiana University School of MedicineIndiana University Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals gene expression differences between individual cells and also identifies different cell populations that are present in the bulk starting material. To obtain an accurate assessment of patient samples, single-cell suspensions need to be generated as soon as possible once the tissue or sample has been collected. However, this requirement poses logistical challenges for experimental designs involving multiple samples from the same subject since these samples would ideally be processed at the same time to minimize technical variation in data analysis. Although cryopreservation has been shown to largely preserve the transcriptome, it is unclear whether the freeze-thaw process might alter gene expression profiles in a cell-type specific manner or whether changes in cell-type proportions might also occur. To address these questions in the context of multiple myeloma clinical studies, we performed single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) to compare fresh and frozen cells isolated from bone marrow aspirates of six multiple myeloma patients, analyzing both myeloma cells (CD138

Indexed as

bone marrow aspiratecryopreservationDMSOmultiple myelomasingle-cell RNA sequencing

Identifiers

PMID33968139
PMCPMC8099152
OpenAlexW3153046022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.