Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33968114›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2021

Meiosis Progression and Recombination in Holocentric Plants: What Is Known?

Paulo G Hofstatter, Gokilavani Thangavel, Marco Castellani, André Marques

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Epigenetic regulation during meiosis and crossover.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paulo G HofstatterDepartment of Chromosome Biology, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany.
Gokilavani ThangavelDepartment of Chromosome Biology, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany.
Marco CastellaniDepartment of Chromosome Biology, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany.
André MarquesDepartment of Chromosome Biology, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany.
Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Differently from the common monocentric organization of eukaryotic chromosomes, the so-called holocentric chromosomes present many centromeric regions along their length. This chromosomal organization can be found in animal and plant lineages, whose distribution suggests that it has evolved independently several times. Holocentric chromosomes present an advantage: even broken chromosome parts can be correctly segregated upon cell division. However, the evolution of holocentricity brought about consequences to nuclear processes and several adaptations are necessary to cope with this new organization. Centromeres of monocentric chromosomes are involved in a two-step cohesion release during meiosis. To deal with that holocentric lineages developed different adaptations, like the chromosome remodeling strategy in

Indexed as

centromerecohesionholocentric chromosomeinverted meiosismeiotic recombination

Identifiers

PMID33968114
PMCPMC8100227
OpenAlexW3159393220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.