Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33968098›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2021

Nathalie Marquez, María L Giachero, Stéphane Declerck, Daniel A Ducasse

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Multilocus Identification of IndigenousCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Characterization, Biocontrol, and Fungicide Sensitivity ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Cold-Stressed Soybean Sensitivity to Charcoal Rot.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Cloning and Characterization of the Mycovirus MpChrV2 fromJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. A Novel NeotropicalMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Microbiome responses to naturalPlant and soil · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nathalie MarquezInstituto de Patología Vegetal, Centro de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Córdoba, Argentina.
María L GiacheroInstituto de Patología Vegetal, Centro de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Córdoba, Argentina.
Stéphane DeclerckEarth and Life Institute, Mycology, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Daniel A DucasseInstituto de Patología Vegetal, Centro de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Córdoba, Argentina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Macrophomina phaseolinamethods of controlpathogecityplant pathogen interactionsoil-borne fungus

Identifiers

PMID33968098
PMCPMC8100579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.