Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33967980›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2021

Rapid and Sensitive Detection of Tomato Brown Rugose Fruit Virus in Tomato and Pepper Seeds by Reverse Transcription Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Assays (Real Time and Visual) and Comparison With RT-PCR End-Point and RT-qPCR Methods.

Domenico Rizzo, Daniele Da Lio, Alessandra Panattoni, Chiara Salemi, Giovanni Cappellini, Linda Bartolini, Giuseppe Parrella

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Pepper Plants HarboringPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Domenico RizzoLaboratory of Phytopathological Diagnostics and Molecular Biology, Plant Protection Service of Tuscany, Pistoia, Italy.
Daniele Da LioDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Agro-Environmental Sciences, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Alessandra PanattoniDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Agro-Environmental Sciences, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Chiara SalemiDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Agro-Environmental Sciences, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Giovanni CappelliniLaboratory of Phytopathological Diagnostics and Molecular Biology, Plant Protection Service of Tuscany, Pistoia, Italy.
Linda BartoliniLaboratory of Phytopathological Diagnostics and Molecular Biology, Plant Protection Service of Tuscany, Pistoia, Italy.
Giuseppe ParrellaInstitute for Sustainable Plant Protection of National Research Council (IPSP-CNR), Portici, Italy.
University of Pisa · ITInstitute for Sustainable Plant Protection · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tomato brown rugose fruit virus (ToBRFV) represents an emerging viral threat to the productivity of tomato and pepper protected cultivation worldwide. This virus has got the status of quarantine organism in the European Union (EU) countries. In particular, tomato and pepper seeds will need to be free of ToBRFV before entering the EU and before coming on the market. Thus, lab tests are needed. Here, we develop and validate a one-step reverse transcription LAMP platform for the detection of ToBRFV in tomato and pepper leaves, by real-time assay [reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP)] and visual screening (visual RT-LAMP). Moreover, these methods can also be applied successfully for ToBRFV detection in tomato and pepper seeds. The diagnostic specificity and sensitivity of both RT-LAMP and visual RT-LAMP are both 100%, with a detection limit of nearly 2.25 fg/μl, showing the same sensitivity as RT-qPCR Sybr Green, but 100 times more sensitive than end-point RT-PCR diagnostic methods. In artificially contaminated seeds, the proposed LAMP assays detected ToBRFV in 100% of contaminated seed lots, for up to 0.025-0.033% contamination rates in tomato and pepper, respectively. Our results demonstrate that the proposed LAMP assays are simple, inexpensive, and sensitive enough for the detection of ToBRFV, especially in seed health testing. Hence, these methods have great potential application in the routine detection of ToBRFV, both in seeds and plants, reducing the risk of epidemics.

Indexed as

RT-LAMP assayseeds contaminationseed testingtomato brown rugose fruit virusvirus diagnostic

Identifiers

PMID33967980
PMCPMC8096992
OpenAlexW3155010749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.