ArticleFrontiers in physiology2021
High-Resolution Measurement of Local Activation Time Differences From Bipolar Electrogram Amplitude.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Generating patient-specific computational models with point cloud data from human atrial electrophysiology studies.PloS one · 2026Article
- A Review of Personalised Cardiac Computational Modelling Using Electroanatomical Mapping Data.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2024Review
- Article
- Impact of electrode orientation, myocardial wall thickness, and myofiber direction on intracardiac electrograms: numerical modeling and analytical solutions.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- An Efficient Hybrid Methodology for Local Activation Waves Detection under Complex Fractionated Atrial Electrograms of Atrial Fibrillation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Localized changes in myocardial conduction velocity (CV) are pro-arrhythmic, but high-resolution mapping of local CV is not yet possible during clinical electrophysiology procedures. This is in part because measurement of local CV at small spatial scales (1 mm) requires accurate annotation of local activation time (LAT) differences with very high temporal resolution (≤1 ms), beyond that of standard clinical methods. We sought to develop a method for high-resolution measurement of LAT differences and validate against existing techniques. First, we use a simplified theoretical model to identify a quantitative relationship between the LAT difference of a pair of electrodes and the peak amplitude of the bipolar EGM measured between them. This allows LAT differences to be calculated from bipolar EGM peak amplitude, by a novel "Determination of EGM Latencies by Transformation of Amplitude" (DELTA) method. Next, we use simulated EGMs from a computational model to validate this method. With 1 kHz sampling, LAT differences less than 4 ms were more accurately measured with DELTA than by standard LAT annotation (mean error 3.8% vs. 22.9%). In a 1-dimensional and a 2-dimension model, CV calculations were more accurate using LAT differences found by the DELTA method than by standard LAT annotation (by unipolar dV/dt timing). DELTA-derived LAT differences were more accurate than standard LAT annotation in simulated complex fractionated EGMs from a model incorporating fibrosis. Finally, we validated the DELTA method
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.