ReviewFrontiers in human neuroscience2021
A Methodological Review of fNIRS in Driving Research: Relevance to the Future of Autonomous Vehicles.
Review in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- The mechanism of external cueing interventions in improving freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease: an fNIRS study.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- Applications of Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) in Monitoring Treatment Response in Psychiatry: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- A Comprehensive Review of Unobtrusive Biosensing in Intelligent Vehicles: Sensors, Algorithms, and Integration Challenges.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- NeuroSafeDrive: An Intelligent System Using fNIRS for Driver Distraction Recognition.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Safety Decision-Making for Autonomous Vehicles Integrating Passenger Physiological States by fNIRS.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- From lab to life: challenges and perspectives of fNIRS for haemodynamic-based neurofeedback in real-world environments.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024Review
- How Do Drivers Perceive Risks During Automated Driving Scenarios? An fNIRS Neuroimaging Study.Human factors · 2024Article
- Role of the prefrontal cortex in musical and verbal short-term memory: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy study.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- An event-based magnetoencephalography study of simulated driving: Establishing a novel paradigm to probe the dynamic interplay of executive and motor function.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- Cortical activation and functional connectivity during locomotion tasks in Parkinson's disease with freezing of gait.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2023Article
- Study on the effects and mechanisms of rhythmic auditory stimulation on freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease: investigation based on functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) technology.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As automobile manufacturers have begun to design, engineer, and test autonomous driving systems of the future, brain imaging with functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) can provide unique insights about cognitive processes associated with evolving levels of autonomy implemented in the automobile. Modern fNIRS devices provide a portable, relatively affordable, and robust form of functional neuroimaging that allows researchers to investigate brain function in real-world environments. The trend toward "naturalistic neuroscience" is evident in the growing number of studies that leverage the methodological flexibility of fNIRS, and in doing so, significantly expand the scope of cognitive function that is accessible to observation via functional brain imaging (i.e., from the simulator to on-road scenarios). While more than a decade's worth of study in this field of fNIRS driving research has led to many interesting findings, the number of studies applying fNIRS during autonomous modes of operation is limited. To support future research that directly addresses this lack in autonomous driving research with fNIRS, we argue that a cogent distillation of the methods used to date will help facilitate and streamline this research of tomorrow. To that end, here we provide a methodological review of the existing fNIRS driving research, with the overarching goal of highlighting the current diversity in methodological approaches. We argue that standardization of these approaches will facilitate greater overlap of methods by researchers from all disciplines, which will, in-turn, allow for meta-analysis of future results. We conclude by providing recommendations for advancing the use of such fNIRS technology in furthering understanding the adoption of safe autonomous vehicle technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.