Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33967702›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neural circuits2021

A Hypothesis for Theta Rhythm Frequency Control in CA1 Microcircuits.

Frances K Skinner, Scott Rich, Anton R Lunyov, Jeremie Lefebvre, Alexandra P Chatzikalymniou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The accumulation of extracellular KScientific reports · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Frances K SkinnerDivision of Clinical and Computational Neuroscience, Krembil Brain Institute, Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Scott RichDivision of Clinical and Computational Neuroscience, Krembil Brain Institute, Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Anton R LunyovDivision of Clinical and Computational Neuroscience, Krembil Brain Institute, Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jeremie LefebvreDivision of Clinical and Computational Neuroscience, Krembil Brain Institute, Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Alexandra P ChatzikalymniouDivision of Clinical and Computational Neuroscience, Krembil Brain Institute, Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational models of neural circuits with varying levels of biophysical detail have been generated in pursuit of an underlying mechanism explaining the ubiquitous hippocampal theta rhythm. However, within the theta rhythm are at least two types with distinct frequencies associated with different behavioral states, an aspect that must be considered in pursuit of these mechanistic explanations. Here, using our previously developed excitatory-inhibitory network models that generate theta rhythms, we investigate the robustness of theta generation to intrinsic neuronal variability by building a database of heterogeneous excitatory cells and implementing them in our microcircuit model. We specifically investigate the impact of three key "building block" features of the excitatory cell model that underlie our model design: these cells' rheobase, their capacity for post-inhibitory rebound, and their spike-frequency adaptation. We show that theta rhythms at various frequencies can arise dependent upon the combination of these building block features, and we find that the speed of these oscillations are dependent upon the excitatory cells' response to inhibitory drive, as encapsulated by their phase response curves. Taken together, these findings support a hypothesis for theta frequency control that includes two aspects: (i) an internal mechanism that stems from the building block features of excitatory cell dynamics; (ii) an external mechanism that we describe as "inhibition-based tuning" of excitatory cell firing. We propose that these mechanisms control theta rhythm frequencies and underlie their robustness.

Indexed as

HippocampusTheta RhythmNeuronshippocampusinhibitionmicrocircuitnetworktheta oscillationtheta rhythm

Identifiers

PMID33967702
PMCPMC8097141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.