ArticleJournal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFP
Comparison of cytokeratin expressions among orthokeratinized odontogenic cysts, epidermoid cysts and odontogenic keratocysts: An immunohistochemical study.
Article in Journal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- SOX2 and cytokeratins 5, 8 and 18 as potential stem cell biomarkers in botryoid odontogenic, lateral periodontal and gingival cysts.Histology and histopathology · 2026Article
- Odontogenic Keratocyst, Orthokeratinized Odontogenic Cyst and Epidermoid Cyst - an Immunohistochemical Comparison.Acta stomatologica Croatica · 2025Article
- Immunohistochemical Analysis of Dentigerous Cysts and Odontogenic Keratocysts Associated with Impacted Third Molars-A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOrthokeratinized odontogenic cysts are keratinizing jaw cysts and due their association with impacted teeth and keratinaceous content, they resemble odontogenic keratocysts but differ in regards to biological behaviour, being less aggressive. To unravel the nature of OOCs, as they resemble epidermoid cysts histologically and due to their developmental resemblances to OKCs, this study was conducted. AIM AND
objectiveTo compare the cytokeratin expressions of CK 10 and CK 19 among orthokeratinized odontogenic keratocysts, epidermoid cysts and odontogenic keratocysts by immunohistochemical study. MATERIALS AND
methods30 cases of all three cysts were collected, 10 cases in each of these cysts (OOCs, EDCs and OKCs) were incubated with CK 10 and CK 19 markers respectively. IHC staining was performed and assessed all layers of epithelium. All the data were analyzed using SPSS software, P values were obtained by the Chi-square test and Fisher's test.
resultsThe expression pattern of CK10 showed 100% positive in both OOCs and EDCs with significant difference in OKCs. CK19 expression, between EDCs and OKCs was significant but between OOCs & EDCs and OOCs & OKCs was found to be statistically insignificant.
conclusionCK 10 expressions in both OOCs and EDCs were near identical both in terms of expression and patterns of expression in surface and spinous layers. OOCs may not be distinguished from EDCs both histologically and with CK 10 expression. CK19 expression between OOCs & EDCs and OOCs & OKCs was statistically insignificant. Thus, based upon CK 19 expression, no significant differences were found between OOCs & EDCs and OOCs & OKCs, implying that OOCs resemble both EDCs and OKCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.