Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33967405›Full record

ArticleExpert systems with applications2021

Determination of COVID-19 pneumonia based on generalized convolutional neural network model from chest X-ray images.

Adi Alhudhaif, Kemal Polat, Onur Karaman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Expert systems with applications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
11.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. COVID-19-The Role of Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning: A Newfangled.Archives of computational methods in engineering : state of the art reviews · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Adi AlhudhaifDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer Engineering and Sciences in Al-kharj, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 151, Al-Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia.
Kemal PolatDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University, Bolu, Turkey.
Onur KaramanAkdeniz University, Vocational School of Health Services, Department of Medical Imaging Techniques, Antalya 07070, Turkey.
Akdeniz University · TRBolu Abant İzzet Baysal University · TRPrince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

X-ray units have become one of the most advantageous candidates for triaging the new Coronavirus disease COVID-19 infected patients thanks to its relatively low radiation dose, ease of access, practical, reduced prices, and quick imaging process. This research intended to develop a reliable convolutional-neural-network (CNN) model for the classification of COVID-19 from chest X-ray views. Moreover, it is aimed to prevent bias issues due to the database. Transfer learning-based CNN model was developed by using a sum of 1,218 chest X-ray images (CXIs) consisting of 368 COVID-19 pneumonia and 850 other pneumonia cases by pre-trained architectures, including DenseNet-201, ResNet-18, and SqueezeNet. The chest X-ray images were acquired from publicly available databases, and each individual image was carefully selected to prevent any bias problem. A stratified 5-fold cross-validation approach was utilized with a ratio of 90% for training and 10% for the testing (unseen folds), in which 20% of training data was used as a validation set to prevent overfitting problems. The binary classification performances of the proposed CNN models were evaluated by the testing data. The activation mapping approach was implemented to improve the causality and visuality of the radiograph. The outcomes demonstrated that the proposed CNN model built on DenseNet-201 architecture outperformed amongst the others with the highest accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-scores of 94.96%, 89.74%, 94.59%, and 92.11%, respectively. The results indicated that the reliable diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia from CXIs based on the CNN model opens the door to accelerate triage, save critical time, and prioritize resources besides assisting the radiologists.

Indexed as

Chest X-ray imagesConvolutional Neural Network (CNN)Corona Virus (COVID-19)Deep learning

Identifiers

PMID33967405
PMCPMC8093008
OpenAlexW3157943311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.