Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33967138›Full record

ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2021

Risk Factors for the Development of High-risk Stigmata in Branch-duct Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms.

Tatsuhiro Yamazaki, Takeshi Tomoda, Hironari Kato, Kazuya Miyamoto, Akihiro Matsumi, Eijiro Ueta, Yuki Fujii, Yosuke Saragai, Daisuke Uchida, Kazuyuki Matsumoto and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Assessing Follow-Up Duration in Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm Patients.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tatsuhiro YamazakiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Hospital, Japan.
Takeshi TomodaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Hospital, Japan.
Hironari KatoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Hospital, Japan.
Kazuya MiyamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Hospital, Japan.
Akihiro MatsumiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Hospital, Japan.
Eijiro UetaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Hospital, Japan.
Yuki FujiiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Hospital, Japan.
Yosuke SaragaiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Hospital, Japan.
Daisuke UchidaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Hospital, Japan.
Kazuyuki MatsumotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Hospital, Japan.
Shigeru HoriguchiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Hospital, Japan.
Koichiro TsutsumiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Hospital, Japan.
Hiroyuki OkadaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Hospital, Japan.
Okayama University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective Strict follow-up is recommended for branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BD-IPMNs) to avoid missing the development of high-risk stigmata (HRS) at a premalignant stage. This study explored the risk factors associated with the development of HRS during follow-up. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of 283 patients with BD-IPMN, treated at Okayama University Hospital in Japan between January 2009 and December 2016. Only patients with imaging studies indicative of classical features of BD-IPMN without HRS and followed for over one year were included in the study. We performed radiological follow-up every six months and collected patients' demographic data, cyst characteristics, and clinical outcomes and used univariate logistic regression models to determine the odds of developing HRS. Results Ten patients (3.5%) developed HRS after a median surveillance period of 55.8 months. The main pancreatic duct (MPD) size (5-9 mm) and cyst growth rate (>2.5 mm/year) were both suggested to be possible risk factors for the development of HRS [odds ratio, 14.2; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.1-65.2, p=0.0006, and odds ratio, 6.1; 95% CI 1.5-25.5, p=0.014]. Regarding the number of worrisome features (WFs), the rate of HRS development was 2.0% (4/199) in cases with no WF, 1.6% (1/62) in cases with single WF and 22.7% (5/22) in cases with multiple WFs, respectively. The rate of HRS development was significantly higher in cases with multiple WFs than in the other cases (p<0.0001). Conclusion MPD dilation, rapid cyst growth, and multiple WFs were significant risk factors for the development of HRS. In the presence of such features, it is necessary to closely follow the development of HRS and avoid missing the best opportunity to perform surgical intervention.

Indexed as

Pancreatic Intraductal NeoplasmsPancreatic NeoplasmsHumansPancreatic DuctsRetrospective StudiesRisk Factorsintraductal papillary mucinous neoplasmpancreatic cancerprognosis factorsurveillance

Identifiers

PMID33967138
PMCPMC8580771
OpenAlexW3125642690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.