Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33967070›Full record

SynthesisNeuroRehabilitation2021

Distance-limited walk tests post-stroke: A systematic review of measurement properties.

Darren Kai-Young Cheng, Matthieu Dagenais, Kyla Alsbury-Nealy, Jean Michelle Legasto, Stephanie Scodras, Gayatri Aravind, Pam Takhar, Erica Nekolaichuk, Nancy Margaret Salbach

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in NeuroRehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Impact of Tai Ji Yunshou with Visual Feedback on Balance and Mobility in Stroke Patients.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Darren Kai-Young ChengDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Canada.
Matthieu DagenaisRehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Canada.
Kyla Alsbury-NealyDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Canada.
Jean Michelle LegastoDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Canada.
Stephanie ScodrasDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Canada.
Gayatri AravindMichener Institute of Education, University Health Network, Canada.
Pam TakharDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Canada.
Erica NekolaichukGerstein Science Information Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Nancy Margaret SalbachDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImproving walking capacity is a key objective of post-stroke rehabilitation. Evidence describing the quality and protocols of standardized tools for assessing walking capacity can facilitate their implementation.

objectiveTo synthesize existing literature describing test protocols and measurement properties of distance-limited walk tests in people post-stroke.

methodsElectronic database searches were completed in 2017. Records were screened and appraised for quality.

resultsData were extracted from 43 eligible articles. Among the 12 walk tests identified, the 10-metre walk test (10mWT) at a comfortable pace was most commonly evaluated. Sixty-three unique protocols at comfortable and fast paces were identified. Walking pace and walkway surface, but not walkway length, influenced walking speed. Intraclass correlation coefficients for test-retest reliability ranged from 0.80-0.99 across walk tests. Measurement error values ranged from 0.04-0.40 and 0.06 to 0.20 for the 10mWT at comfortable and fast and paces, respectively. Across walk tests, performance was most frequently correlated with measures of strength, balance, and physical activity (r = 0.26-0.8, p < 0.05).

conclusionsThe 10mWT has the most evidence of reliability and validity. Findings indicate that studies that include people with severe walking deficits, in acute and subacute phases of recovery, with improved quality of reporting, are needed.

Indexed as

HumansReproducibility of ResultsStroke RehabilitationWalking SpeedWalk TestassessmentGaitmeasurement propertiesrehabilitationstroke

Identifiers

PMID33967070
PMCPMC8293643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.