Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33966468›Full record

SynthesisInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2022

Treatment of carotid cavernous sinus fistulas with flow diverters. A case report and systematic review.

Theodosios Stamatopoulos, Evangelos Anagnostou, Sotirios Plakas, Konstantinos Papachristou, Panagiotis Lagos, Apostolos Samelis, Shahram Derakhshani, Aristotelis Mitsos

Open access · bronzeAbstract readCase ReportsSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Theodosios StamatopoulosDepartment of Neurosurgery, 401 General Military Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7587-5157
Evangelos AnagnostouDepartment of Neurosurgery, 401 General Military Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6733-9530
Sotirios PlakasDepartment of Neurosurgery, 401 General Military Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Konstantinos PapachristouDepartment of Neurosurgery, 401 General Military Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Panagiotis LagosDepartment of Neurosurgery, 401 General Military Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Apostolos SamelisDepartment of Neurosurgery, 401 General Military Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Shahram DerakhshaniDepartment of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, Queen's University Hospital, Essex Center for Neurological Sciences, London, UK.
Aristotelis MitsosDepartment of Neurosurgery, 401 General Military Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece.
401 General Military Hospital of Athens · GRAristotle University of Thessaloniki · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCarotid cavernous fistulas (CCFs) are rare, usually follow head trauma or aneurysmal rupture. Recent treatment options include endovascular techniques such as flow diversion devices (FDDs).

objectiveTo present our case treated with FDD application with transarterial cavernous-sinus coiling and present a systematic review on the use and effectiveness of FDDs in CCF treatment. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe present our case of CCF treatment with FDD. A search was also conducted in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane until November 2020. Reference lists were also cross-checked.

resultsIncluding our case, thirty-eight patients were identified with a CCF that was treated with FDDs in sixteen studies. Twenty-two patients were females, nine were males and the rest unidentified. The mean age was 52,6 years (range 17-86, SD± 19.28). Thirty-six patients suffered from direct and two from indirect CCFs. Single FDD was used in four cases, single FDD with embolic materials in eleven cases, multiple overlapping FDDs were used in six cases and multiple overlapping FDDs with embolic materials were used in seventeen cases. Thirty-five patients (92,1%) had clinical improvement, immediate angiographic occlusion was seen in 44,7% of the cases, while long-term occlusion rate was 100% but with variable follow-up periods. One patient (2,6%) presented with a neurological deficit related to FDD deployment.

conclusionTargeted treatment of CCFs with single or overlapping FDDs with or without adjunct embolic agents offers a high success rate, both clinically and long-term angiographically compared to other endovascular methods alone. However, further research with multi-center prospective trials is warranted.

Indexed as

Carotid-Cavernous Sinus FistulaCavernous SinusEmbolization, TherapeuticEndovascular ProceduresAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung Adultcarotid-cavernous sinus fistulaembolizationflow diverter devicesHumanssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID33966468
PMCPMC8905080
OpenAlexW3161810725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.