Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33966363›Full record

ArticleUltrasonography (Seoul, Korea)2021

Deep learning-based automated quantification of the hepatorenal index for evaluation of fatty liver by ultrasonography.

Dong Ik Cha, Tae Wook Kang, Ji Hye Min, Ijin Joo, Dong Hyun Sinn, Sang Yun Ha, Kyunga Kim, Gunwoo Lee, Jonghyon Yi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Artificial intelligence in liver ultrasound.World journal of gastroenterology · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dong Ik ChaDepartment of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Tae Wook KangDepartment of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Ji Hye MinDepartment of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Ijin JooDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Dong Hyun SinnDepartment of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Sang Yun HaDepartment of Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Kyunga KimBiomedical Statistics Center, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Gunwoo LeeMedical Imaging R&D Group, Health & Medical Equipment Business, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea.
Jonghyon YiMedical Imaging R&D Group, Health & Medical Equipment Business, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea.
Samsung Medical Center · KRSamsung (South Korea) · KRSeoul National University Hospital · KR

Funding

Samsung Medical Center PHO0132251
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to develop and validate a fully-automatic quantification of the hepatorenal index (HRI) calculated by a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) comparable to the interpretations of radiologists experienced in ultrasound (US) imaging.

methodsIn this retrospective analysis, DCNN-based organ segmentation with Gaussian mixture modeling for automated quantification of the HRI was developed using abdominal US images from a previous study. For validation, 294 patients who underwent abdominal US examination before living-donor liver transplantation were selected. Interobserver agreement for the measured brightness of the liver and kidney and the calculated HRI were analyzed between two board-certified radiologists and DCNN using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).

resultsMost patients had normal (n=95) or mild (n=198) fatty liver. The ICCs of hepatic and renal brightness measurements and the calculated HRI between the two radiologists were 0.892 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.866 to 0.913), 0.898 (95% CI, 0.873 to 0.918), and 0.681 (95% CI, 0.615 to 0.738) for the first session and 0.920 (95% CI, 0.901 to 0.936), 0.874 (95% CI, 0.844 to 0.898), and 0.579 (95% CI, 0.497 to 0.650) for the second session, respectively; the results ranged from moderate to excellent agreement. Using the same task, the ICCs of the hepatic and renal measurements and the calculated HRI between the average values of the two radiologists and DCNN were 0.919 (95% CI, 0.899 to 0.935), 0.916 (95% CI, 0.895 to 0.932), and 0.734 (95% CI, 0.676 to 0.782), respectively, showing high to excellent agreement.

conclusionAutomated quantification of HRI using DCNN can yield HRI measurements similar to those obtained by experienced radiologists in patients with normal or mild fatty liver.

Indexed as

Deep learningFatty liverLiverUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID33966363
PMCPMC8446496
OpenAlexW3129345636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.