Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33966331›Full record

Trial reportLiver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver2021

Immunogenicity and safety of HBAI20 Hepatitis B vaccine in non-responders: Double-blinded, randomised, controlled phase 2 trial.

Özgür M Koc, Philippe de Smedt, Cécile Kremer, Geert Robaeys, Pierre van Damme, Niel Hens, Jorge Almeida, Frank Falkenberg, Paul Savelkoul, Astrid Oude Lashof and 1 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Immunogenicity and safety of HBAI20 Hepatitis B vaccine in non-responders: Double-blinded, randomised, controlled phase 2 trial.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2021
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Özgür M KocDepartment of Medical Microbiology, School of NUTRIM, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3678-5703
Philippe de SmedtCentre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute, Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium.
Cécile KremerData Science Institute, I-BioStat, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.
Geert RobaeysDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium.
Pierre van DammeCentre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute, Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium.
Niel HensData Science Institute, I-BioStat, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.
Jorge AlmeidaCyTuVax B.V, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Frank FalkenbergCyTuVax B.V, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Paul SavelkoulDepartment of Medical Microbiology, School of NUTRIM, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Astrid Oude LashofDepartment of Medical Microbiology, School of NUTRIM, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
BE RESPONDER Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsApproximately 5%-10% of the general population respond inadequately to licensed recombinant hepatitis B vaccines. We assessed the immunogenicity and safety of a new HBAI20 vaccine, consisting of a new AI20 adjuvant (20-µg recombinant human IL-2 attached to 20-µg aluminium hydroxide) in combination with HBVaxPro®-10 µg.

methodsIn a double-blinded, randomised, controlled phase 2 trial, 18- to 59-year-old healthy non-responders (titre <10 mIU/ml after three or more doses of hepatitis B vaccine) were assigned (3:1 ratio) to receive either HBAI20 vaccine or HBVaxPro®-10 µg in a 0, 1 and 2-month schedule. The primary outcome was seroprotection (titre ≥ 10 mIU/ml) measured 1-3 months following the third vaccination.

resultsA total of 133 participants were randomised to receive either HBAI20 vaccine (n = 101) or HBVaxPro®-10 µg (n = 32). In the modified intention-to-treat analysis, the seroprotection rate after the third vaccination was 92.0% (80/87) in the HBAI20 group and 79.3% (23/29) in the HBVaxPro®-10-µg group, P = .068. Using a generalised linear mixed model to adjust for stratification factors, a higher odds of seroprotection with HBAI20 vaccine was shown (adjusted odds ratio = 3.48, P = .028). Frequency of mild and moderate local adverse events was greater in the HBAI20 group than in the HBVaxPro®-10 µg. Rates of severe local adverse events and systemic adverse events were low and similar in both groups.

conclusionsIn this group of hepatitis B vaccine non-responders, the HBAI20 vaccine demonstrated a higher seroprotection rate when adjusting for stratification factors and a similar safety profile compared to the licensed recombinant HBVaxPro®-10 µg.

Indexed as

Hepatitis BHepatitis B VaccinesAdolescentAdultDouble-Blind MethodHepatitis B AntibodiesHumansMiddle AgedVaccinationYoung AdultHepatitis B AntibodiesHepatitis B VaccinesadjuvantHBAI20hepatitis B vaccineimmunogenicitynon-responder

Identifiers

PMID33966331
PMCPMC8518051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.