ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2021
Multiview multimodal network for breast cancer diagnosis in contrast-enhanced spectral mammography images.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning in multi-modal breast cancer data fusion: a literature review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Review
- From Innovation to Application: Can Emerging Imaging Techniques Transform Breast Cancer Diagnosis?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Classification of fashion e-commerce products using ResNet-BERT multi-modal deep learning and transfer learning optimization.PloS one · 2025Article
- Multimodal data integration for oncology in the era of deep neural networks: a review.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Review
- Histopathology in focus: a review on explainable multi-modal approaches for breast cancer diagnosis.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- Detection and classification of breast lesions using multiple information on contrast-enhanced mammography by a multiprocess deep-learning system: A multicenter study.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2023Article
- Deep learning-enabled fully automated pipeline system for segmentation and classification of single-mass breast lesions using contrast-enhanced mammography: a prospective, multicentre study.EClinicalMedicine · 2023Article
- Predicting Malignancy of Breast Imaging Findings Using Quantitative Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM).Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Attention-based deep learning for breast lesions classification on contrast enhanced spectral mammography: a multicentre study.British journal of cancer · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeCESM (contrast-enhanced spectral mammography) is an efficient tool for detecting breast cancer because of its image characteristics. However, among most deep learning-based methods for breast cancer classification, few models can integrate both its multiview and multimodal features. To effectively utilize the image features of CESM and thus help physicians to improve the accuracy of diagnosis, we propose a multiview multimodal network (MVMM-Net).
methodsThe experiment is carried out to evaluate the in-house CESM images dataset taken from 95 patients aged 21-74 years with 760 images. The framework consists of three main stages: the input of the model, image feature extraction, and image classification. The first stage is to preprocess the CESM to utilize its multiview and multimodal features effectively. In the feature extraction stage, a deep learning-based network is used to extract CESM images features. The last stage is to integrate different features for classification using the MVMM-Net model.
resultsAccording to the experimental results, the proposed method based on the Res2Net50 framework achieves an accuracy of 96.591%, sensitivity of 96.396%, specificity of 96.350%, precision of 96.833%, F1_score of 0.966, and AUC of 0.966 on the test set. Comparative experiments illustrate that the classification performance of the model can be improved by using multiview multimodal features.
conclusionWe proposed a deep learning classification model that combines multiple features of CESM. The results of the experiment indicate that our method is more precise than the state-of-the-art methods and produces accurate results for the classification of CESM images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33966155What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.