ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2021
Laboratory prognostic score for predicting 14-day mortality in terminally ill patients with gynecologic malignancy.
Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic laboratory score to predict 14-day mortality in terminally ill patients with respiratory malignancy.International journal of clinical oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere are few studies developing a scoring system for short-term survival of patients with gynecologic malignancy.
methodsSeventy-three terminally ill patients with gynecologic malignancy who were admitted to our palliative care unit (PCU) from June 2009 to February 2018 were included. We accumulated routine blood data within 3 months before PCU discharge. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis was performed on each blood factor, and area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to determine the predictive value for 14-day survival after the blood test. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify significant independent prognostic factors of 14-day mortality. To develop a scoring system for 14-day mortality, laboratory prognostic score for gynecologic malignancy (G-LPS) was calculated using the sum of indices of the independent prognostic factors.
resultsMultivariable analysis showed that 6 of 24 indices, namely, C-reactive protein ≥ 13.3 mg/dL, total bilirubin ≥ 1.1 mg/dL, sodium < 131 mEq/L, blood urea nitrogen ≥ 28 mg/dL, white blood cell count ≥ 17.7 × 103/μL, and eosinophil level < 0.2%, were significant independent factors of 14-day survival. G-LPS was obtained from the sum of the six indices. The AUC was 0.7977 at the optimal cut-off value of G-LPS 3. G-LPS 3 predicted death within 14 days with a sensitivity of 72% and a specificity of 79%.
conclusionsSix of the 24 laboratory indices were identified as independent prognostic factors of 14-day mortality in terminally ill patients with gynecologic malignancy. G-LPS showed acceptable ability of predicting 14-day survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.