Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33966110›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of applied physiology2021

On the reliability and validity of central fatigue determination.

Raffy Dotan, Stacey Woods, Paola Contessa

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of applied physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Does mental fatigue affect performance in racket sports? A systematic review.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Editorial: Fatigue: physiology and pathology.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Quantification of central fatigue: a central debate.European journal of applied physiology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Raffy DotanDepartment of Kinesiology, Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, Brock University, St Catharines, ON, Canada. rdotan@brocku.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6870-2872
Stacey WoodsDepartment of Kinesiology, Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, Brock University, St Catharines, ON, Canada.
Paola ContessaDelsys & Altec Incorporated, Natick, MA, USA.
Brock University · CAAltec (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical performance fatigue can be ascribed to both peripheral and central components. Central fatigue, however, is an elusive entity, consisting of cognitive/sensory component and presumably also a neuro-physiological component that are difficult to tease apart and assess independently of each other. The most widely accepted method for the assessment of central fatigue is based on the premise that decreasing volitional muscle activation (VA), as determined by the interpolated twitch technique (ITT) in fatiguing muscles, reflects increasing central fatigue. Suffering its own shortcomings, the validity of VA determination under fatigued conditions has never been proven and is only assumed. This review presents evidence that questions ITT's reliability and validity in reflecting VA in the fatiguing muscle and, consequently, VA's validity for central fatigue assessment. Specifically highlighted is the paradox of children and endurance athletes, who share striking endurance characteristics, being claimed as more centrally fatigable than untrained adults. Further research and new directions are needed for confirming and quantifying central fatigue and teasing apart its psychologic and neuromotor components.

Indexed as

FatigueElectromyographyHumansMuscle ContractionMuscle, SkeletalPhysical EnduranceReproducibility of ResultsAthletesChildrenEnduranceMuscle compositionPost-activation potentiationResting twitchSuperimposed twitchVolitional activation

Identifiers

PMID33966110
OpenAlexW3162312038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.