Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33965797›Full record

ReviewBiomaterials2021

Microfluidic formulation of nanoparticles for biomedical applications.

Sarah J Shepherd, David Issadore, Michael J Mitchell

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomaterials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 140 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
140citing papers in PubMed
19.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

140 citing papers in PubMed, 373 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Post-loading ribonucleic acid into lipid nanoparticle carriers.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

80 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah J ShepherdDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
David IssadoreDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. Electronic address: issadore@seas.upenn.edu.
Michael J MitchellDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Institute for Immunology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Cardiovascular Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. Electronic address: mjmitch@seas.upenn.edu.
University of Pennsylvania · USCalifornia Institute for Regenerative Medicine · US

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA CAN CTR SUPPORT GRANTP30CA016520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Robert H. Vonderheide · 1985 to 2026
$222.3M
Center for Sub-Cellular GenomicsRM1HG010023 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI EBERWINE, JAMES H, KIM, JUNHYONG · 2018 to 2022
$11.0M
In utero gene editing to cure a metabolic liver diseaseR01DK123049 · NIDDK · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI PERANTEAU, WILLIAM H. · 2020 to 2024
$3.7M
Targeting stem-like cells and their niche in pancreatic cancerR37CA244911 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI Tuomas Tammela · 2020 to 2026
$3.4M
A data-driven drug delivery (4D) platform for probing and treating the chemoresistant bone marrow microenvironmentDP2TR002776 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MITCHELL, MICHAEL J · 2018 to 2018
$2.4M
Modular approach for the delivery of antibodies into the cytoplasm of cellsR01CA241661 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI TSOURKAS, ANDREW · 2019 to 2023
$1.8M
Nanomagnetic isolation and sensing for mobile HIV-1 self-testingR61AI147406 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ISSADORE, DAVID AARON · 2019 to 2021
$1.4M
Rapid unbiased isolation and in situ RNA analysis of circulating tumor cells using a magnetic micropore-based diagnostic chipR33CA206907 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ISSADORE, DAVID AARON · 2017 to 2019
$1.1M
A nanomagnetic platform technology to characterize traumatic brain injury using brain derived extracellular vesiclesR21MH118170 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ISSADORE, DAVID AARON · 2018 to 2019
$414k
Spatially-targeted heating of magnetic nanoparticlesR21EB023989 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ISSADORE, DAVID AARON · 2018 to 2019
$411k
NCATS NIH HHS DP2 TR002776NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016520NCI NIH HHS R01 CA241661NCI NIH HHS R33 CA206907NCI NIH HHS R37 CA244911NHGRI NIH HHS RM1 HG010023NIAID NIH HHS R61 AI147406NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB023989NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK123049NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH118170
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanomedicine has made significant advances in clinical applications since the late-20th century, in part due to its distinct advantages in biocompatibility, potency, and novel therapeutic applications. Many nanoparticle (NP) therapies have been approved for clinical use, including as imaging agents or as platforms for drug delivery and gene therapy. However, there are remaining challenges that hinder translation, such as non-scalable production methods and the inefficiency of current NP formulations in delivering their cargo to their target. To address challenges with existing formulation methods that have batch-to-batch variability and produce particles with high dispersity, microfluidics-devices that manipulate fluids on a micrometer scale-have demonstrated enormous potential to generate reproducible NP formulations for therapeutic, diagnostic, and preventative applications. Microfluidic-generated NP formulations have been shown to have enhanced properties for biomedical applications by formulating NPs with more controlled physical properties than is possible with bulk techniques-such as size, size distribution, and loading efficiency. In this review, we highlight advances in microfluidic technologies for the formulation of NPs, with an emphasis on lipid-based NPs, polymeric NPs, and inorganic NPs. We provide a summary of microfluidic devices used for NP formulation with their advantages and respective challenges. Additionally, we provide our analysis for future outlooks in the field of NP formulation and microfluidics, with emerging topics of production scale-independent formulations through device parallelization and multi-step reactions within droplets.

Indexed as

MicrofluidicsNanoparticlesDrug Delivery SystemsNanomedicinePolymersPolymersDrug deliveryImagingMicrofluidicsNanoparticle

Identifiers

PMID33965797
PMCPMC8752123
OpenAlexW3158110844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.